A numerical and experimental study of a laminar sooting coflow jet-A1 diffusion flame Saffaripour, M.; Zabeti, P.; Dworkin, S. B.; Zhang, Q.; Thomson, M. J.; Guo, H.; Liu, F.; Smallwood, G. J.
Proceedings of Combustion Institute -Canadian SectionSpring Technical Meeting Carleton University, Ottawa
IntroductionDeveloping multidimensional flame models for blended liquid fuels, such as jet fuel, is challenging, mainly due to the very large chemical kinetic mechanisms and the associated computational resources required. Numerous researchers use a surrogate mixture to approximate the chemical and thermophysical properties of complex multicomponent blends. Honnet et al.[1] performed detailed calculations of an opposed jet diffusion flame using a surrogate mixture (80% n-decane and 20% 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, by mass) and measured the soot volume fraction, autoignition, and extinction properties of both aviation kerosene and the surrogate. The results of the experiments for the surrogate and the actual jet fuel were reasonably close. The agreement between the numerical calculations using the detailed chemical kinetic mechanism of the surrogate, and the experiments were also satisfactory. Moss et al.[2] implemented a flamelet-based two-equation soot model for a simple Jet-A surrogate, comprising 77% ndecane and 23% 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene by liquid volume, in a laminar coflow diffusion flame, and measured soot volume fraction, mixture fraction, and temperature. The radial soot volume fraction profiles and location of the peak concentration were predicted reasonably well. Wen et al. [3] modeled soot formation in a turbulent coflow nonpremixed kerosene flame using a kerosene surrogate (20% toluene and 80% decane by liquid volume), a laminar flamelet approach, and the 141-chemical species mechanism of Dagaut et al. [4]. Comparisons were made for soot volume fraction and soot number density. After unsatisfactory initial comparisons, improvements were obtained in the results with a Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)-based soot inception model as compared to an acetylene-based model.Numerically solving multidimensional flames with detailed chemistry and transport proves to be a computationally intensive task, especially when complex fuels, such as jet fuel, are considered. Due to the inherently high computational cost of such models, parallel implementation has seen significant development in the last two decades. In 1991, Smooke and Giovangigli [5] presented a numerical simulation of a laminar coflow methane/air diffusion flame with 6 processors, using strip-domain decomposition. Since that time, numerous researchers have utilized a similar strip-domain decomposition strategy wherein subdomain boundaries are placed perpendicular to the axial flow direction. Zhang et al. [6,7] developed a detailed model for an ethylene/air coflow flame using a semi-implicit scheme and divided the computational domain into 16 subdomains. Flame temperatures, species concentrations, soot volume fraction, and soot number density compared well to exp...