2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandgap engineering in semiconductor quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is not recommended to reduce DE by further increase in h active since that will result in the presence of large islands that are nonradiative and act as sinks for the generated carriers, thus degrading the device efficiency [23]. Alternatively, one can perform postgrowth annealing since that was shown to effectively reduce DE and, at the same time, improve the material quality [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is not recommended to reduce DE by further increase in h active since that will result in the presence of large islands that are nonradiative and act as sinks for the generated carriers, thus degrading the device efficiency [23]. Alternatively, one can perform postgrowth annealing since that was shown to effectively reduce DE and, at the same time, improve the material quality [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%