2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-013-1365-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandwidth Partitioning and SINR Threshold Analysis of Fractional Frequency Reuse in OFDMA Cellular Networks for Real Time and Best Effort Traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, in case of SFR, it is seen that on increasing γ th , the supported traffic intensity (Erlangs) is more for lower values of ρ p . This is because when γ th increases, the average bandwidth required by the user decreases [5]. Further, while increasing γ th , more and more centre users switch to EB.…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Rt Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6, in case of SFR, it is seen that on increasing γ th , the supported traffic intensity (Erlangs) is more for lower values of ρ p . This is because when γ th increases, the average bandwidth required by the user decreases [5]. Further, while increasing γ th , more and more centre users switch to EB.…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Rt Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free variables in the objective function are γ th , α and ρ p . However, α is obtained as per probability method in case of FFR [5], whereas it is fixed to two‐third in the case of SFR. Therefore the mean SE of FFR is given as SE¯=SEfalse¯normalc+SEfalse¯normalewhere SEfalse¯normalc=αβγthγmax,clog2)(1+γnormalcηPfalse(γnormalcfalsefalse|γc¯>γthfalse)thinmathspacedγnormalcand SEfalse¯normale=false(1αfalse)3β0γmax,normalelog21+γeηP(γe|γnormalcfalse¯γth)normaldγeHowever, as α = 2/3 in SFR, the mean SE of SFR in CB and EB is similar to (31) and (32), but the terms αβ and ((1 − α )/3) β in the equations become (2/3) β and (1/3) β .…”
Section: System Description For Be Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The standard distance-based cell partition in FFR cannot be directly applicable in the case of irregular geometry cells. Moreover, cell edges behave differently in w.r.t SINR levels and size [50]. However, the problem concerned with irregular cell partition is predicted in [58] for models based on PPP where users are classified into cell-center or cell-edge users based on an already set threshold SINR as compared to their actual space from the near serving BS.…”
Section: B Ffr Approaches In Irregular Geometry Cellular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%