2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank loan-loss provisioning, central bank rules vs. estimation: The case of Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained supplement curve of unexpected loss should have increasing monotonicity in order to make economic sense. Therefore, an adjustment is implemented on the methodology proposed in the already referred working paper [10], thus, ensuring an additional layer of conservatism for the overall approach. The monotonicity is achieved by redefining the add-on, as indicated below.…”
Section: Lgd In-default Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained supplement curve of unexpected loss should have increasing monotonicity in order to make economic sense. Therefore, an adjustment is implemented on the methodology proposed in the already referred working paper [10], thus, ensuring an additional layer of conservatism for the overall approach. The monotonicity is achieved by redefining the add-on, as indicated below.…”
Section: Lgd In-default Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim [6], based on the one factor models from Frye [7] and on the proposal given by Düllmann and Trapp [8], presents several approaches to obtain the LGD in-default and ELBE for small samples with insufficient historical depth. Dermine and de Carvalho [9,10] estimates the consequences of defaulting using two different approaches. The first approach follows the proposal from Altman [11] and Altman and Suggit [12] where the percentage of good and bad loans is analyzed after a number of years after the origination date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strand of the banking literature finds that bank characteristics and business cycles are important determinants of loss rates. Dermine and De Carvalho (2008) estimate dynamic provisions for non-performing loans of Portuguese banks over time. Other prior studies analyse the determinants of loan loss provisions using banks' financial ratios and economic factors both in the US and abroad.…”
Section: Prediction Of Banks' Credit Losses and Their Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If capital requirements have to face the only unexpected losses, provisioning policies can reduce their pro-cyclicality, since banks would increase loan loss reserves by making more provisions during an economic expansion, while they would draw from these reserves when the credit losses amount gets higher, as economic conditions deteriorate. This mechanism lies at the basis of the so called "dynamic" provisioning currently adopted in Spain (Pérez et al, 2008;Fern andez de Lis et al, 2000; see also Dermine and Neto de Carvalho, 2008, for an analysis of the peculiar provisioning schedule imposed by the central bank of Portugal). On the contrary, if capital requirements are intended to cover also the expected loss, pro-cyclicality stretches to the provisions as well (see Bouvatier and Lepetit, 2012, for a study showing how in a forward-looking provisioning system, where statistical provisions are used to smooth the evolution of total LLPs, the issue of pro-cyclicality of loan market fluctuations does not exist).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%