2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank privatization in developing countries: A summary of lessons and findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
111
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, their research showed that early privatized banks are more efficient than later-privatized banks. Their findings are consistent with the ones of Clarke et al (2005) which reported that although bank privatization usually improves bank efficiency, gains are greater when the government fully relinquishes control, when banks are privatized to strategic investors, when foreign banks are allowed to participate in the privatization process and when the government does not restrict competition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, their research showed that early privatized banks are more efficient than later-privatized banks. Their findings are consistent with the ones of Clarke et al (2005) which reported that although bank privatization usually improves bank efficiency, gains are greater when the government fully relinquishes control, when banks are privatized to strategic investors, when foreign banks are allowed to participate in the privatization process and when the government does not restrict competition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The present work is motivated by the relative shortage of empirical evidence on the impact of mergers and acquisitions on Romanian banks. The current stream of literature dealing with the effects of M&As on Romanian banks consists of regional analyses (among other Eastern European countries), such as those of Bonin et al, 2003 and2005;Clarke et al, 2005, or cross-border analyses (Correa, 2008;Beccalli and Frantz, 2008). In addition, there is a handful of studies assessing the Romanian banking performance in general, regardless of the M&A operations (Grigorian and Manole, 2002;Asaftei and Kumbhakar, 2007;Gondor and Munteanu, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the state bank interest expense ratio is comparable to those of domestic and foreign-owned privatesector banks, the interest revenue ratios of state-owned banks are the lowest among all bank categories, rendering the interest margin minimal for the average state-owned bank. Given this finding, one may be tempted to recommend privatization of state-owned banks as Clarke et al (2005) suggest. However, while world financial markets go through hardships that have not been experienced since the Great Depression and while many private enterprises are nationalized throughout the world, privatization of state-owned banks is not something to be recommended at this time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government must enhance the regulations and strengthen the institutions to promote the private banks because the majority of studies concluded that bank privatization improves the banks' performance when it is adopted correctly (Clarke, Cull, & Shirley, 2005). On the other hand, the public banks can benefit from the foreign banks in term of management styles, new technologies and risk-taking.…”
Section: Ishaq Hacini Khadra Dahoumentioning
confidence: 99%