2018
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.2018.1463930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barbies, Goddesses, and Entrepreneurs: Discourses of Gendered Digital Embodiment in Women’s Health Apps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, apps for women largely ignored user diversity, depicting White, thin, young, middle-class women. 37 The language and topics that health apps use are also gendered. We became aware of this through our own text-messaging study to increase physical activity in university students in the San Francisco Bay Area of the USA.…”
Section: Biases In Health App User Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, apps for women largely ignored user diversity, depicting White, thin, young, middle-class women. 37 The language and topics that health apps use are also gendered. We became aware of this through our own text-messaging study to increase physical activity in university students in the San Francisco Bay Area of the USA.…”
Section: Biases In Health App User Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As detailed elsewhere (Hamper, 2020), the privileged socio-economic positioning of participants shaped their strong sense of individual agency in navigating apps and associated health advice. The modes of selfregulation and reproductive responsibility that are advocated through pregnancy apps are underpinned by normative ideals of health, coupledom, femininity, and good mothering (Doshi, 2018;Johnson, 2014;Thomas & Lupton, 2016) that have the potential to reproduce inequalities along identity markers such as class, race, age, body size, and sexuality (McRobbie, 2015). Pregnancy apps also assume that pregnancies are wanted, leaving little space for potential ambivalence felt by prospective parents or the fact that feeling excited about prospective motherhood is not a universal experience (Rich, 1986;Tiidenberg & Baym, 2017).…”
Section: Bonding Work and Spacing Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature around biopolitics, neoliberalism, technology, and the quantified self is vast and well established. It spans critical work on health and health adjacent technologies, inclusive of apps and wearables (Fotopoulou and O'Riordan 2017), the critique of contemporary labour practices that center surveillance, wellness, and productivity (Moore and Robinson 2016), gender and body projects (Sanders 2017;Doshi 2018), and the embodied performance of normative citizenship (Baldwin-Philippi 2015). Deborah Lupton, the most prolific writer in this area, argues that the union of technology with biopower and neoliberalism has resulted in a culture of quantification in which health is no longer seen as the responsibility of the states, but as the domain of individuals whose behaviour and choices are dispositive (Lupton 2014).…”
Section: A Brief Political Economy Of Sleep Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%