2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barley shoot biomass responds strongly to N:P stoichiometry and intraspecific competition, whereas roots only alter their foraging

Abstract: Aims Root system responses to the limitation of either nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) are well documented, but how the early root system responds to (co-) limitation of one (N or P) or both in a stoichiometric framework is not well-known. In addition, how intraspecific competition alters plant responses to N:P stoichiometry is understudied. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of N:P stoichiometry and competition on root system responses and overall plant performance. Methods Plants (Hordeum vulgar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, plastic root responses to plant order of arrival are more likely to explain why grasses-first communities rooted more shallowly than the others did. Such plastic root responses affecting root allocation and foraging have been well documented in the past (Mahall and Callaway 1991, Semchenko et al 2007, Mommer et al 2012, Kumar et al 2020, Lepik et al 2021) but, to date, there has been little evidence that the order of arrival of plants can affect the root distribution of individual species (Weidlich et al 2018b). These results highlight the need for more research on how plant order of arrival modulates root foraging and distribution at the functional group and species level, which is a particularly challenging endeavour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, plastic root responses to plant order of arrival are more likely to explain why grasses-first communities rooted more shallowly than the others did. Such plastic root responses affecting root allocation and foraging have been well documented in the past (Mahall and Callaway 1991, Semchenko et al 2007, Mommer et al 2012, Kumar et al 2020, Lepik et al 2021) but, to date, there has been little evidence that the order of arrival of plants can affect the root distribution of individual species (Weidlich et al 2018b). These results highlight the need for more research on how plant order of arrival modulates root foraging and distribution at the functional group and species level, which is a particularly challenging endeavour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also noteworthy that the range of modification of susceptibility was at least twofold higher than the one on biomass. Considering that most previous studies focused on the impact of intraspecific neighbours on biomass (Kigathi et al, 2013;Bowsher et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2020), our finding is advocating for a more systematic evaluation of NMS in competition experiments.…”
Section: Neighbours Change Susceptibility and Gene Expression But Hav...mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This is likely because at higher levels of nutrient concentration, plants may suffer from strong intraspecific competitions due to rapidly clonal growth. In this case, a longer and bigger root would be more beneficial for the plants to obtain resources in order to fight against their intraspecific competitors [ 11 , 43 , 64 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants can respond to varying resources through changing biomass allocations to above- and below-ground organs [ 67 , 68 ]. In general, many terrestrial plants would allocate more biomass to below-ground organs under low-nutrient soils [ 66 , 69 71 ], and this is also frequently observed for many aquatic macrophytes [ 72 , 73 ]. We also observed a greater root to shoot ratio at lower nutrient concentrations in the floating clonal plant S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%