Barriers and (im)mobility in Rio de Janeiro

Abstract

International audienceIn Rio de Janeiro, immobility or the share of people with no journeys on any given day is very high (46%). Immobility has a marked geographical dimension in what is a segregated city. But income has only limited explanatory power. The population structure, with high proportions of people who are not in the labour force and who are unemployed, accounts for the high levels of immobility in the poor districts. Although population structure effects prevail, spatial factors such as the severance effect also account for differences between districts. Indeed, Rio de Janeiro features many different types of barriers that affect immobility in several districts and for several population groups. These barriers may be physical or symbolic and perceptive. This study proposes therefore to identify the scope of those barriers as they affect immobility.Our findings from the latest household travel survey available for the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro (2003) illustrate the effects of the two types of barrier, physical or symbolic and perceptive, on immobility that more specifically mark out certain categories of individuals such as housewives, the elderly, the unemployed or poor workers. Conversely, the wealthier active population seems to be little affected by the two types of barriers under study. Lastly, our results show that social fragmentation does not lead to greater immobility of favela populations in the heart of rich districts, but on the contrary to increased mobility, especially for the working age population in employment or looking for employment

The spatial dimensions of immobility in France

“…For example, the rate of immobility is only 8% in Paris, 13% on average in urban centres with more than 100,000 inhabitants, 15% in the periurban communities around these centres and finally more than 20% in rural areas (Armoogum et al 2010). On a more close-grained scale, Motte-Baumvol et al (2015) show the effects of local accessibility on immobility in a study of Rio de Janeiro, where districts with poor access to jobs, shops and services have the highest levels of immobility. Moreover, this study demonstrates differences in spatial effects between categories of individuals, based on their activity.…”

Writing the Latin American city: Trajectories of urban scholarship

“…However, Suárez et al (2015) found that low-income workers had the shortest commutes given the location of informal work activities. In Rio de Janeiro, Motte-Baumvol et al (2016) found high levels (46%) of immobility in the poor districts given the proportion of the population that is not in the labour force. This research expands on the type of barriers to commuting to encompass not only the physical but also the symbolic and perceptive ones by giving prominence to the needs of housewives, the elderly, the unemployed and poor workers.…”

Discussion on São Paulo Mobility Plans

“…The immobility problem is also present in the major metropolis of the country, with emphasis on the article "Barriers and (im)mobility in Rio de Janeiro" in which Motte-Baumvol, Bonin, Nassi and Belton-Chevallier [15] (2015, p.1) report that there is 46% of immobility on a given day in Rio de Janeiro. This value is related to physical or symbolic barriers, as well as the age, income, and type of activity of the population that refrains from travel on a given day.…”