2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and solutions for expansion of electricity grids—the German experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But centralization alone does not solve the problem (cf. [14]). What seems to be an issue is the lack of communication between the highest level of decision-making and local governance level as well as the general population.…”
Section: Governance and Administrative Processesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But centralization alone does not solve the problem (cf. [14]). What seems to be an issue is the lack of communication between the highest level of decision-making and local governance level as well as the general population.…”
Section: Governance and Administrative Processesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One can argue that the German model evolved towards a more participatory and legitimate formula [14,37]. On the other hand, grid-development within Germany is actually as much "grid locked" as are the interconnectors.…”
Section: Governance and Administrative Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We test the framework in the German context given that it combines an aspiring renewable energy target with the gradual phase-out of nuclear energy by 2022. 1 Furthermore, disputes regarding both preferable technology pathways [5] and acceptance problems of energy infrastructure can be referenced for this case [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Technological factors comprise uncertainty about the dominant design, quality, increased complexity of innovative technologies and application (Jackson, 2010;Schleich, 2009;Sorrell et al, 2004;van Soest and Bulte, 2001). Institutional barriers such as path dependent technological application due to investments into corresponding infrastructure, low acceptance among the local population or unanticipated or reoccurring changes in the policy design and administrative approval also impede the technological diffusion process (Foxon et al, 2008;Iyer et al, 2013;Klein Woolthuis et al, 2005;Steinbach, 2013;Wilson et al, 2012). Volatile or artificially low energy prices and incomplete carbon markets represent economic barriers to diffusion by increasing uncertainty and rendering investments in novel EUEDs unprofitable, which lead to slow capital stock turnover and corresponding long payback periods as upfront costs are high (Gallagher et al, 2006;Jaffe et al, 2005;Sorrell et al, 2004).…”
Section: Challenges Facing Adoption Of Novel End-use Energy Demand Tementioning
confidence: 99%