2011
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to Low Vision Rehabilitation: The Montreal Barriers Study

Abstract: It seems that even under ideal referral situations, there remain barriers to vision rehabilitation services that have not been specifically identified in the present study. Further research is necessary on the psychological and psychosocial contributors to this process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
72
4
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
72
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, we concede that the estimated prevalence of 15/100 000 is likely to underestimate the true population. Previous work has shown failures to detect dual impairment in subpopulations, such as in younger individuals with multiple impairment 41 ; in addition, awareness and utilization of rehabilitation services for low vision, for example, has been shown to be less than ideal, with up to 54% referred clients choosing not to utilize them 42 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, we concede that the estimated prevalence of 15/100 000 is likely to underestimate the true population. Previous work has shown failures to detect dual impairment in subpopulations, such as in younger individuals with multiple impairment 41 ; in addition, awareness and utilization of rehabilitation services for low vision, for example, has been shown to be less than ideal, with up to 54% referred clients choosing not to utilize them 42 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Ironically, many health authorities and governments agencies have used the 6/18 VA cut-off point (usually in conjunction with a visual field threshold value) to decide who would be eligible for free vision rehabilitation services and who would not. 44,45 Another concern is that we defined the need for LVS based on presence of ''untreatable eye disease,'' which is problematic as the concept of ''untreatable eye disease'' evolves with time. For example, the wide use of anti-angiogenic agents (e.g., bevacizumab and ranibizumab) in urban settings has now transformed many cases of AMD and retinal vein occlusion into treatable lesions, although this treatment is not widely available in the least developed countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around the world, it is clear that despite the development of more holistic, patient‐centred low vision rehabilitation services, in many areas the extent of provision is not adequate and / or people are not being referred to services or choosing not to use them . For those working in the field it is difficult to comprehend why developments have not progressed more rapidly.…”
Section: The Development Of Services and Current Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around the world, it is clear that despite the development of more holistic, patientcentred low vision rehabilitation services, in many areas the extent of provision is not adequate 4,49 and / or people are not being referred to services 50,51 or choosing not to use them. [51][52][53] For those working in the field it is difficult to comprehend why developments have not progressed more rapidly. Factors responsible for this are many and complex, including inadequacies of funding (including refusal by medical insurance companies), difficulty with transport, rurality, distance to services, gender, language, low referral rates, poor knowledge about services, social stigma, race, diagnosis, living situation, lack of equipment and facilities, availability of trained staff and lack of evidence of the effectiveness of care.…”
Section: How Accessible Is Low Vision Care?mentioning
confidence: 99%