2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to naloxone use and acceptance among opioid users, first responders, and emergency department providers in New Hampshire, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants cited 4 main barriers that may impede rates of naloxone acceptance, possession, and use: (1) stigma related to substance use, (2) indifference toward overdose, (3) fear of the negative consequences of carrying naloxone, and (4) fear of misrecognizing the need for naloxone. Some of these barriers have been identified by other researchers, including the fear of precipitating withdrawal sickness, stigma, and the fear of arrest [ 12 , 24 , 36 , 37 ]. Our study participants cited stigma toward drug users and concerns of being outed as a drug user as influencing naloxone-related practices, including decisions about whether or not to carry or prominently display naloxone when carrying it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants cited 4 main barriers that may impede rates of naloxone acceptance, possession, and use: (1) stigma related to substance use, (2) indifference toward overdose, (3) fear of the negative consequences of carrying naloxone, and (4) fear of misrecognizing the need for naloxone. Some of these barriers have been identified by other researchers, including the fear of precipitating withdrawal sickness, stigma, and the fear of arrest [ 12 , 24 , 36 , 37 ]. Our study participants cited stigma toward drug users and concerns of being outed as a drug user as influencing naloxone-related practices, including decisions about whether or not to carry or prominently display naloxone when carrying it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size and distribution modalities of programs vary by state and city; however, these programs all typically provide no-cost naloxone to people who use opioids, along with training in how to identify an overdose, conduct rescue breathing and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and administer naloxone [9,10]. Overdose training and naloxone are also provided to staff at many drug treatment programs and syringe service programs (SSPs), and to first responders such as law enforcement, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and fire department personnel [11,12]. These efforts have resulted in greater access to naloxone for many individuals who might not otherwise receive the medication [13][14][15], and evaluations of THN programs have consistently found that these programs effectively reduce overdose mortality and lead to few adverse events [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative evaluations of structured training sessions on OD response for law enforcement officers in the U.S. states of Connecticut and Rhode Island have demonstrated that such training can effectively equip first responders with the skills and knowledge needed to apply these new fatal OD prevention strategies when responding to calls for service ( Saucier et al, 2016 ). However, qualitative assessments have highlighted the emotional burden of implementing these new strategies (often resulting in compassion fatigue or “burnout”) among law enforcement ( Bessen et al, 2019 ) as well as growing concern among first responders that such strategies may enable riskier substance use ( Saunders et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, naloxone may be used unnecessarily when less aversive treatments might be administered by emergency medical personnel (Bledsoe, 2018). Finally, officers have argued that naloxone may enable opioid use by providing a safety net in the event of overdose (Bessen et al., 2019), though this has not been substantiated in prior research (Seal et al., 2005; Wagner et al., 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%