2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to PES programs in Indigenous communities: A lesson in land tenure insecurity from the Hopi Indian reservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, given the substantial amount of funding expected for REDD+ and for carbon credits more generally, there have been concerns that lack of clear tenure would encourage a type of resource rush or "land grab" to make carbon deals and capture REDD+ funding, leading to dispossession of traditional and customary landholders. Limiting participation to those with formal land titles could also bake in historical inequalities and exclude IPLC (Broegaard et al, 2017;Chomba et al, 2016;Johnson et al, 2018;Samndong & Vatn, 2018).…”
Section: Tenure Interventions In the Context Of The Dedicated Grant M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, given the substantial amount of funding expected for REDD+ and for carbon credits more generally, there have been concerns that lack of clear tenure would encourage a type of resource rush or "land grab" to make carbon deals and capture REDD+ funding, leading to dispossession of traditional and customary landholders. Limiting participation to those with formal land titles could also bake in historical inequalities and exclude IPLC (Broegaard et al, 2017;Chomba et al, 2016;Johnson et al, 2018;Samndong & Vatn, 2018).…”
Section: Tenure Interventions In the Context Of The Dedicated Grant M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in 1887 Native American farmers in the United States lost a significant amount of land when the Dawes Act regulated and subdivided tribal landholdings, giving many parcels to White settlers and leaving Native Americans with smaller communal holdings [44]. Today some federally funded conservation incentive programs for agriculturalists in the United States exclude Native Americans from qualifying because of these communal land tenure arrangements [45]. For Black farmers, discriminatory loan servicing and loan denial has led to foreclosure and the loss of their farms [46].…”
Section: Defining Social Sustainability In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some farmers use ecological practices that do not match up with the guidelines, which are designed with modern industrial farming in mind. For example, Hopi farmers have had difficulty in getting NRCS to qualify their traditional practices for EQIP funding, even though their farming practices have much higher conservation standards than the majority of what EQIP funds (Johnson et al ., 2018). All the while, EQIP disproportionately funds repairing the environmental consequences of larger-scale and industrialized farming, including huge concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs; John, 2017).…”
Section: Federal Conservation Policy: Limitations and Potential Of Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%