Bartlett's schema theory: The unreplicated “portrait d'homme” series from 1932

Abstract

In 1932, Frederic Bartlett laid the foundation for the later schema theory. His key assumption of previous knowledge affecting the processing of new stimuli was illustrated in the famous "portrait d'homme" series. Sequenced reproductions of ambiguous stimuli showed progressive object-likeness. As Bartlett pointed out, activation of specific schemata, for instance "the face schema", biases memory retrieval towards such schemata. In five experiments (Experiment 1, n = 53; Experiment 2, n = 177; Experiment 3, n = 36; Experiment 4, n = 6; Experiment 5, n = 2), we tested several factors potentially influencing retrieval biases-for example, by varying the general procedure of reproduction (repeated vs. serial) and by omitting versus providing visual or semantic cues for activating face schemata. Participants inspected face-like stimuli with the caption "portrait of the human" and reproduced them repeatedly under specific conditions. None of the experiments revealed a systematic tendency towards Bartlett's described case, even when the participants were explicitly instructed to draw "a face" like the previously inspected one. In one of the "serial reproduction" experiments, we even obtained contrary effects with decreasing face-likeness over the reproduction generations. A close analysis of the original findings raises questions about the replicability of Bartlett's findings, qualifying the "portrait d'homme" series more or less as an illustrative example of the main idea of reconstructive memory.

Understanding human perception by human-made illusions

“…Bartlett already showed that we do not read the full information from a visual display or a narrative, but that we rely on schemata reflecting the essence of things, stories, and situations being strongly shaped by prior knowledge and its specific activation (see for a critical reflection of Bartlett’s method Carbon and Albrecht, 2012). …”

Immediate Survival Focus: Synthesizing Life History Theory and Dual Process Models to Explain Substance Use

“…Research suggests that humans integrate contextually related experiences into expectancy networks, or cognitive schemas (similar concepts include summative memory traces, associative networks, and attitudes; Carbon and Albrecht, 2012;Conrey and Smith, 2007;Goldman et al, 2006;Ross and Hill, 2002;Stacy and Wiers, 2006). Schemas are hierarchically organized representations of context that can be formed and/or activated in the same manner as component expectancies (see above; Stacy and Wiers, 2006).…”

Treating Adolescents with Family-Based Mindfulness

“…(p. 314) As such, the concept of schema attempted to explain the temporal aspects of the acquisition of knowledge, and memory formation and retrieval, which was in contrast with the widely accepted notion of memory as a spatial aspect only. In Bartlett's original conceptualization of schema he observed that "the assignment of a name to objects observed often strongly infl uenced their immediate reproduction or description" as "the mere naming of an ambiguous stimulus directs the observer's interpretation towards the representation activated by the caption of the stimulus" (Carbon & Albrecht, 2012, p. 2259. He proceeded to defi ne schema as: …an active organization of past reactions, or of past experiences, which must always be supposed to be operating in any well-adapted organic response.…”

“…These processes change information, bias interpretations, and lead our actions." (Carbon & Albrecht, 2012, pp. 2269-2270.…”