2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BARUMODEL: Combined Data Based Mechanistic models of runoff response in a managed rainforest catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short duration of the storms in the Sapat Kalisun catchment, combined with the non-aquifer geology and small size (i.e. 4 km 2 ), explains the flashy nature of the stream hydrographs observed in this catchment (see Chappell et al (1999Chappell et al ( , 2004aChappell et al ( , 2006). …”
Section: Rain-event (Storm) Durationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The short duration of the storms in the Sapat Kalisun catchment, combined with the non-aquifer geology and small size (i.e. 4 km 2 ), explains the flashy nature of the stream hydrographs observed in this catchment (see Chappell et al (1999Chappell et al ( , 2004aChappell et al ( , 2006). …”
Section: Rain-event (Storm) Durationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This peak daily intensity is comparable to that recorded in the other non-cyclonic region, but much less than that recorded for cyclonic northeastern Australia, the global maximum or even the maximum for temperate UK ( Figure 5). The almost complete absence of 5 min periods with >50 mm h 1 equivalent rainfall events explains why the soils of the Sapat Kalisun catchment, with their mean topsoil permeability of 500 mm h 1 (Chappell et al, 1998), fail to generate significant volumes of infiltration-excess overland flow (see Chappell et al (1999Chappell et al ( , 2004aChappell et al ( , 2006). …”
Section: The 5-min Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time constants are catchment specific; for example, for a first-order rainfall-runoff model which identifies just the dominant mode (one pathway), the time constant can vary from less than an hour (e.g. for a small, flashy catchment in Malaysian Borneo, Chappell et al, 2006) to more than 3 months (e.g. for a chalk stream in Berkshire, UK, Ockenden and Chappell, 2011).…”
Section: Transfer Function Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power law used to represent the rainfall-runoff non-linearity did not validate the data very well in the Blackwater catchment. Different representations of the rainfall-runoff linearity were also investigated, such as the Bedford Ouse Sub-Model (Chappell et al, 2006;Young, 2001;Young and Whitehead, 1977), in which the soil storage is related to an antecedent precipitation index. Although changes in the model non-linearity representation made minor differences to model fit, none of the model variants validated the data well for the Blackwater catchment.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Tp Load Dynamics Alongside Runoff Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to numerous examples that have demonstrated the utility of DBM modeling applied to rainfall-flow processes [see e.g., Young, 1998;Lees, 2000;Young, 2001aYoung, , 2003Ratto et al, 2007;Chappell et al, 2006;Ochieng and Otieno, 2009;Young, 2010aYoung, , 2010bBeven et al, 2012;McIntyre et al, 2011, and references therein], including catchments affected by snow melt, where the nonlinearities are more complex .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%