2022
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10530-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baryon asymmetry from Barrow entropy: theoretical predictions and observational constraints

Abstract: We investigate the generation of baryon asymmetry from the corrections brought about in the Friedman equations due to Barrow entropy. In particular, by applying the gravity-thermodynamics conjecture one obtains extra terms in the Friedmann equations that change the Hubble function evolution during the radiation-dominated epoch. Hence, even in the case of standard coupling between the Ricci scalar and baryon current they can lead to a non-zero baryon asymmetry. In order to match observations we find that the Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimization of deviation of R 2 from unity gives the best-fit values b = 0.12 and ∆ = 0.08 at 95% confidence level. We notice that the obtained estimation of Barrow parameter fits with the result ∆ = 0.094 +0.093 −0.101 derived in [26] and is very close to the constraint ∆ = 0.075 +0.001 −0.002 of [76], but it lies outside the intervals 0.005 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.008 [32] and ∆ 1.4 × 10 −4 [28] found via baryogenesis and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis measurements, respectively. This discrepancy might be understood by assuming a HDE description of the Universe with a running Barrow entropy, as discussed in [77].…”
Section: B Interacting Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minimization of deviation of R 2 from unity gives the best-fit values b = 0.12 and ∆ = 0.08 at 95% confidence level. We notice that the obtained estimation of Barrow parameter fits with the result ∆ = 0.094 +0.093 −0.101 derived in [26] and is very close to the constraint ∆ = 0.075 +0.001 −0.002 of [76], but it lies outside the intervals 0.005 ≤ ∆ ≤ 0.008 [32] and ∆ 1.4 × 10 −4 [28] found via baryogenesis and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis measurements, respectively. This discrepancy might be understood by assuming a HDE description of the Universe with a running Barrow entropy, as discussed in [77].…”
Section: B Interacting Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Corrections to the standard entropy-area law are parameterized by the exponent 0 ≤ ∆ ≤ 1, where ∆ = 0 recovers the Bekenstein-Hawking limit, while ∆ = 1 corresponds to the maximal entropy deformation. It is worth noting that upper bounds on ∆ have been derived in different contexts in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantum gravity effects are parameterized by the Barrow exponent 0 ≤ ∆ ≤ 1, with ∆ = 0 giving the BH limit, while ∆ = 1 corresponding to the maximal entropy deformation. It is worth mentioning that cosmological constraints on ∆ have been inferred in [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, some applications have been investigated. For example, Baryon asymmetry has been studied [25], inflation driven by Barrow holographic dark energy has been considered [26], early and late periods of the universe from a new generalized entropy have been analyzed [27], Barrow holographic dark energy has been formulated [28], the cosmology using Barrow entropy has been proposed [29], the generalized second law of thermodynamics with Barrow entropy has been investigated [30], among others. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to analyze the dynamic evolution of the universe considering the Barrow entropy in f (R) gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%