2009
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baryon resonance analysis from SAID

Abstract: We discuss the analysis of data from πN elastic scattering and single pion photo-and electroproduction. The main focus is a study of low-lying non-strange baryon resonances. Here we concentrate on some difficulties associated with resonance identification, in particular the Roper and higher P11 states.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6], has been used in a recent coupled-channel fit of πN elastic scattering and πN → ηN reaction data. It gives a realistic description of the data with χ 2 per datum better than any other parametrization or model, to our knowledge [7,8]. The parametrization form used in this fit is given as…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6], has been used in a recent coupled-channel fit of πN elastic scattering and πN → ηN reaction data. It gives a realistic description of the data with χ 2 per datum better than any other parametrization or model, to our knowledge [7,8]. The parametrization form used in this fit is given as…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common conclusion from [2,10] is the strong coupling of the D 13 (1700)(3/2 − ) state to the π∆ (d-wave) channel, something not intuitive nor expected from ordinary quark models. We should note that, as discussed in [12] there could be some reason to miss some resonances in the analysis if the resonances are too wide (Γ >500 MeV) or they posses a small ratio (BR< 4%) to the channel under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most obvious of these is the fact that the goodness of fit to these sets of amplitudes cannot be translated into a quality of fit to the underlying dataset. The subsequent comparison to experimental πN data may result [23] in poorer than expected agreement. In addition, uncertainties on the SE amplitudes [2][3][4][5] do not account for correlated errors, which can be substantial in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%