2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2140/aa5832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basement depth estimation from gravity anomalies: two 2.5D approaches coupled with the exponential density contrast model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negatively sloping best-fit line represents the relationship between the two, i.e., a high Bouguer anomaly is associated with a thin crust and vice versa. This is expected since the depth or the distance of a dense body from the observation point is a significant factor affecting the Bouguer anomaly (e.g., Weilly, 1961;Chakravarthi et al, 2007). Considering that shorter wavelength gravity signals were removed in a typical oceanic arc setting, the main density contrast occurs between the arc crustal layers and the upper mantle.…”
Section: Linear Regression Analyses and Gravity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negatively sloping best-fit line represents the relationship between the two, i.e., a high Bouguer anomaly is associated with a thin crust and vice versa. This is expected since the depth or the distance of a dense body from the observation point is a significant factor affecting the Bouguer anomaly (e.g., Weilly, 1961;Chakravarthi et al, 2007). Considering that shorter wavelength gravity signals were removed in a typical oceanic arc setting, the main density contrast occurs between the arc crustal layers and the upper mantle.…”
Section: Linear Regression Analyses and Gravity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravity method is a non-invasive, cost-efficient and passive method, which measures the difference in the Earth's gravitational field at a certain location, caused by the rock mass properties (density). It has been applied in a wide range of projects such as hydrocarbon (oil and gas) exploration (Yuan et al, 2018;Saghafi and Yarveicy, 2019;Cho et al, 2020), underground cavities or tunnels detection (Pazzi et al, 2018;Abdullah et al, 2019;Saddek et al, 2019), geothermal exploration (Altwegg et al, 2015;Uwiduhaye et al, 2018), geotechnical and engineering application (Debeglia and Dupont, 2002;Arisona et al, 2018), weapons and unexploded ordnances inspections (Abedi et al, 2014), archaeology investigation (Branston and Styles, 2006;Batayneh et al, 2007;Sarlak and Aghajani, 2017), monitoring of ground water (Frappart and Ramillien, 2018;Delobbe et al, 2019), mineral and ores exploration (Hinze, 1960;Chen et al, 2015;Essa and Abo-Ezz, 2021), landfills mapping (Silva et al, 2008;Gaël et al, 2017), radioactive waste management (An et al, 2013), mapping of subsurface structures (Chakravarthi et al, 2017;Deng et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors applied it to image the shape of buried valleys or sedimentary basins, where negative gravity anomalies are correlated with the buried morphology of the basement rock under the sedimentary fill. Some examples are the 2 km deep sedimentary basins in the Santa Rosa plain, San Francisco (McPhee et al, 2007), tens to hundred meters deep quaternary valleys in Lolland, Denmark (Møller et al, 2007), hundred meters deep glacial valleys in the Pyrenees (Perrouty et al, 2015), and 1.6-2.2 km deep grabens in western Turkey (Chakravarthi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%