2012
DOI: 10.2140/ant.2012.6.797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basepoint-free theorems: saturation, b-divisors, and canonical bundle formula

Abstract: We reformulate basepoint-free theorems using notions introduced by Shokurov, such as b-divisors and saturation of linear systems. Our formulation is flexible and has some important applications. One of the main purposes of this paper is to prove a generalization of the basepoint-free theorem in Fukuda's paper "On numerically effective log canonical divisors".

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The class is very useful for inductive arguments on dimension of varieties. For example, the abundance conjecture for abundant klt pairs and log abundant lc pairs are studied by a lot of people ( [28], [37], [10], [19], [13], [17], [23]), and the conjecture is currently known in full generality ( [23], and [17] for projective case). In klt case, the existence of good minimal models or Mori fiber spaces is known ( [32] and [21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class is very useful for inductive arguments on dimension of varieties. For example, the abundance conjecture for abundant klt pairs and log abundant lc pairs are studied by a lot of people ( [28], [37], [10], [19], [13], [17], [23]), and the conjecture is currently known in full generality ( [23], and [17] for projective case). In klt case, the existence of good minimal models or Mori fiber spaces is known ( [32] and [21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4, we observe that the result in Section 3 and a result of Fujino (cf. [Fujino05]), which generalizes the main theorem of Kawamata in [Kawamata85], immediately imply that any minimal model of (X, ∆) is indeed a good model. Therefore, the proof of (1.1) is reduced to proving the existence of a minimal model for the dlt pair (X, ∆).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In this section, we recall a version of Kawamata's theorem (cf. [Kawamata85], [Ambro05], [Fujino05], [Fujino11] and [FG11]) on good minimal models. (1) the image of any strata S I of S = ⌊∆⌋ intersects U 0 ,…”
Section: Base Point Free Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by Remark 2.2, the abundance conjecture (1.1) in dimension ≤ n − 1, and [FG2,Theorem 4.12] (cf. [F4,Corollary 6.7]), there exists a good minimal model f ′ : (W ′ , Γ ′ ) → Z of (W, Γ) in the sense of Birkar-Shokurov over Z. If some S k contracts by the birational map W W ′ (may not be contracting), then K W + Γ − δ S k is pseudo-effective for some δ > 0 from the positivity property of the definition of minimal models (cf.…”
Section: On the Existence Of Minimal Models After Birkarmentioning
confidence: 99%