2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.10272
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basepoint-freeness thresholds and higher syzygies on abelian threefolds

Abstract: For a polarized abelian variety, Z. Jiang and G. Pareschi introduce an invariant and show that the polarization is basepoint free or projectively normal if the invariant is small. Their result is generalized to higher syzygies by F. Caucci, that is, the polarization satisfies property (Np) if the invariant is small.In this paper, we study a relation between the invariant and degrees of abelian subvarieties with respect to the polarization. For abelian threefolds, we give an upper bound of the invariant using d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 1, d) and dimension g with d g i=0 (p + 2) i . In [Ito20], the author observes a similarity between β(l) −1 and Seshadri constants. Since Seshadri constants have a lower-semicontinuity, it is natural to ask whether β(l) is uppersemicontinuous or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…, 1, d) and dimension g with d g i=0 (p + 2) i . In [Ito20], the author observes a similarity between β(l) −1 and Seshadri constants. Since Seshadri constants have a lower-semicontinuity, it is natural to ask whether β(l) is uppersemicontinuous or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Let D = 1 p+2 L. Since (D g ) > (g) g , we may assume that D is an effective Q-divisor with m o (D) > g. Then there exists D 1 = c 1 D for some 0 < c 1 < 1 such that (A, D 1 ) is log canonical at o and the minimal lc center through o is an normal subvariety Z 1 of dimension k ≥ 0. If k = 0, we know that r ′ (L) = 1 p+2 r ′ (D) < 1 p+2 and we conclude by [Ito2,Proposition 1.10].…”
Section: Assume Thatmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Ito ([Ito1] and [Ito2]) proved Conjecture 1.4 for abelian surfaces and abelian threefolds. He also proved that ([Ito2,Proposition 3.3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…) follows directly from the Balian-Low type theorem. To prove (3), we shall use the following inequality (see [30,Lemma 3…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%