Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis

Abstract

The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach’s α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I2 = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach’s α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed.

Person-centered Care Assessment Tool, a focus in quality healthcare: A systematic review of psychometric properties

“…Eventually, CFA began to be employed, a technique that overcame some of these obstacles [47] but had other drawbacks, such as that the strict requirement of zero crossloadings often does not t the data well and that misspeci cation of zero loadings tends to give distorted factors [48]. Recently, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) has been proposed, a technique widely recommended both conceptually and empirically to assess the internal structure of psychological tools [49] since it overcomes the limitations that EFA and CFA have in estimating their parameters [47,48].…”

The mediating role of empathy in the links between relationships with three socialisation agents and adolescents’ prosocial behaviours

“…The empathy measure was adapted and validated in French (Carré et al, 2013). The scale includes three dimensions: emotional contagion (6 items, e.g., ‘I get caught up in other people’s feeling easily’, α = .73), cognitive empathy (8 items, e.g., ‘I can understand my friend’s happiness when she/he does well at something’, α = .75), and emotional disconnection (6 reverse-coded items, e.g., ‘I am not usually aware of my friend’s feelings’, α = .72) and shows good psychometric properties in other adolescents’ populations (see Cabedo Peris et al, 2022).…”

Development and Reliability of a Questionnaire Assessing Stress, Coping, and Empathy (SCOPE) in Occupational Settings: Preliminary Evidence from Veterinarians

“…Even when taking into account social aspects [33][34][35], occupational stress scales have not fully investigated workers' personal psychological functioning. On the other hand, available scales to assess psychological constructs such as coping [36] and empathy [37] have not been designed to examine stress in occupational settings. In fact, very limited attempts have been made at developing a scale intercepting occupational stress in a comprehensive perspective.…”

“…Further, a recent systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis of studies adopting the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), one of the most commonly-used instruments internationally [62], revealed an increasing number of studies over the years, mostly focusing on adolescent populations and legal implications as well as clinical populations [37]. Similarly, some instruments have been identified to measure healthcare professionals' empathy [63].…”