1995
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic fibroblast growth factor can mediate the early inductive events in renal development.

Abstract: METHODSTissues. Timed pregnant F344 rats were euthanized at gestational day 13 (gdl3; the day a spermatic plug was observed was designated as gdO), and embryonic kidneys were surgically excised in phosphate-buffered saline. Metanephrogenic mesenchymes were then isolated from the buds and cultured as described (8). Only mesenchymes from rudiments in which the bud had just begun its primary branching were used, since at this stage it has not been induced to form tubules.Purification of Condensing Activity. Bovin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FGF family of signaling molecules contributes to normal development and various physiological processes, such as neural and mesenchymal commitment/differentiation through an autocrine/paracrine loop with their receptors, indicating a prominent role for this signaling pathway in maintaining cellular plasticity (Bertrand et al, 2003;Sheng et al, 2003). In addition, accumulated evidence in various pathological conditions has indicated a dual role for FGF2 signaling in triggering different processes, such as epithelial-tomesenchymal and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions (Karavanova et al, 1996;Perantoni et al, 1995). Overall, these data show that interpretation of FGF2 signaling only in terms of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is equivocal and does not account for the complexity of cellular plasticity processes, which are especially relevant in EOC pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FGF family of signaling molecules contributes to normal development and various physiological processes, such as neural and mesenchymal commitment/differentiation through an autocrine/paracrine loop with their receptors, indicating a prominent role for this signaling pathway in maintaining cellular plasticity (Bertrand et al, 2003;Sheng et al, 2003). In addition, accumulated evidence in various pathological conditions has indicated a dual role for FGF2 signaling in triggering different processes, such as epithelial-tomesenchymal and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions (Karavanova et al, 1996;Perantoni et al, 1995). Overall, these data show that interpretation of FGF2 signaling only in terms of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is equivocal and does not account for the complexity of cellular plasticity processes, which are especially relevant in EOC pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could also be that Midkine's actions in the fetal kidney depend on additional growth factors as reported in studies showing a positive interaction between FGF2 and Midkine in craniofacial development. 19,39 Multiple FGF family members have been implicated in renal development including FGF8, FGF7 and FGF28, 14,40,41 and one or more of these factors might modulate the mitogenic effects of Midkine shown in our studies. Since the ureteric bud has long been recognized to play an essential role in the survival of the metanephric mesenchyme 5,6,29,42 and is the source of many secreted survival and mitogenic factors, 7,9 we analyzed whether the anti-apoptotic effects of Midkine depend on the presence of the ureteric bud.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This implied involvement of FGF1 and FGF7 in developmental changes between E10.5 and E13.5, despite no detected changes in levels of transcripts for these factors. Both FGF1 and FGF2 have previously been impli- cated in metanephric development (Perantoni et al, 1995;Barasch et al, 1997;Qiao et al, 2001;Zhao et al, 2004). While the FGFs are secreted via a mechanism distinct from the use of an ER signal peptide (Prudovsky et al, 2003) and hence would not have been included in the soluble/secreted class using our prediction tools, these transcripts were actually not outliers themselves, highlighting the need for parallel analyses of signalling pathways.…”
Section: Ingenuity Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%