2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.c034415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic Understanding of Airfoil Characteristics at Low Reynolds Numbers (104–105)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
124
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
124
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…18b, 19b). At this Re range, as the Re decreases below 100,000 there is an increase in drag, particularly because of premature flow separation and failure to reattach, resulting in a reduced drag bucket and a large decrease in lift [36]. At Re in the range between 50,000 and 100,000 the separation bubble and turbulent boundary-layer thickness both increase in size (compared to higher Re ), a consequence of the higher contribution of the viscous forces, resulting in increased parasitic drag [36].…”
Section: Xfoil Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18b, 19b). At this Re range, as the Re decreases below 100,000 there is an increase in drag, particularly because of premature flow separation and failure to reattach, resulting in a reduced drag bucket and a large decrease in lift [36]. At Re in the range between 50,000 and 100,000 the separation bubble and turbulent boundary-layer thickness both increase in size (compared to higher Re ), a consequence of the higher contribution of the viscous forces, resulting in increased parasitic drag [36].…”
Section: Xfoil Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At Re in the range between 50,000 and 100,000 the separation bubble and turbulent boundary-layer thickness both increase in size (compared to higher Re ), a consequence of the higher contribution of the viscous forces, resulting in increased parasitic drag [36]. Nevertheless, at such low Re , the increase in airfoil thickness results in considerable increase in form drag, due to trailing edge separation, while simple flat plates outperform conventional airfoils for Re lower than 50,000 [36].…”
Section: Xfoil Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deprivation in performance is again caused by the failure of the shear layer to reattach. A detailed numerical work [15] done to appreciate the aerodynamics performance of numerous airfoils at low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Fig1: Flight Speed Versus Chord Reynolds Number [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These broad areas of applications over which airfoils are employed presents a significant challenge to engineers in terms of required airfoil performance. Thus numerous airfoil designs have been analyzed at a wide range of operating conditions is the Reynolds number for different aerodynamic performances [3][4][5]. One of the challenging design and aerodynamic analysis of airfoils is at low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%