2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2017.8264593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basis functions design for the approximation of constrained linear quadratic regulator problems encountered in model predictive control

Abstract: By parametrizing input and state trajectories with basis functions different approximations to the constrained linear quadratic regulator problem are obtained. These notes present and discuss technical results that are intended to supplement a corresponding journal article. The results can be applied in a model predictive control context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), (10) where ω denotes the frequency (rad/s). • In case the dynamics in (1) are linear time-invariant, the cost is quadratic, and constraints are absent (g = 0), the choice M = A + BK, where A and B refer to the system dynamics, and K to the infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator gain, recovers the solutions to the infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator problem (see [22] for the continuous-time analogue). Any superposition of the above choices is valid as well, and is obtained by a blockdiagonal choice of the matrix M .…”
Section: A Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), (10) where ω denotes the frequency (rad/s). • In case the dynamics in (1) are linear time-invariant, the cost is quadratic, and constraints are absent (g = 0), the choice M = A + BK, where A and B refer to the system dynamics, and K to the infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator gain, recovers the solutions to the infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator problem (see [22] for the continuous-time analogue). Any superposition of the above choices is valid as well, and is obtained by a blockdiagonal choice of the matrix M .…”
Section: A Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input and state parametrizations that will be introduced in the following can be viewed as approximations to the underlying constrained linear quadratic regulator problem. This point of view has been explored in the technical report [16], where various approximation results (including convergence) are discussed. Preliminary results appeared in the conference papers [17] and [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of a simple first order Laguerre function is still somewhat limited, and for higher-order systems, significant prediction inconsistency may still exist. While it is possible to increase the order of the Laguerre polynomial [15], this is not straightforward in general [16] and not in line with the simplicity concept which is an essential facet of PFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%