2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01277-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Batch-effect detection, correction and characterisation in Illumina HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC BeadChip array data

Abstract: Background Genomic technologies can be subject to significant batch-effects which are known to reduce experimental power and to potentially create false positive results. The Illumina Infinium Methylation BeadChip is a popular technology choice for epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS), but presently, little is known about the nature of batch-effects on these designs. Given the subtlety of biological phenotypes in many EWAS, control for batch-effects should be a consideration. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, for our rst aim, the series of methylation values for each mother was correlated with the corresponding methylation values in her child across the whole epigenome, producing a motherchild Methylation similarity index (MSI) for each familial pair. Since the mother and child were measured in the same slide, this procedure controls for potential biases introduced by the experimental design (i.e., batch effects [41] ). We also correlated methylation values across the whole epigenome in randomly paired mother and child for all possible random mother-child pairs in the same experimental slide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for our rst aim, the series of methylation values for each mother was correlated with the corresponding methylation values in her child across the whole epigenome, producing a motherchild Methylation similarity index (MSI) for each familial pair. Since the mother and child were measured in the same slide, this procedure controls for potential biases introduced by the experimental design (i.e., batch effects [41] ). We also correlated methylation values across the whole epigenome in randomly paired mother and child for all possible random mother-child pairs in the same experimental slide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to our knowledge there are no comprehensive DNA methylation data that characterize the biologic foundation of DN progression. While there are many ways to assess DNA methylation, initial forays into diabetes were made using array hybridization and endonuclease digestion assays ( 39 , 40 ). In this study, to interpret the FinnDiane methylome, we considered that the genome coverage of various methodologies was critical to understanding the influence of methylation on gene function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional normalization, a method that used the internal control probes present on the array to infer between array-technical variation and that extends quantile normalization and outperforms other types of normalization previously used [ 86 ] was carried out. Also, dye correction and normal-exponential out-of-band (NOOB) background correction were applied [ 87 ]. Beta-values (ranging from 0 to 1 and) were obtained as metrics to measure methylation levels and are based on the measured intensities of the pair of probes (a methylated probe and an unmethylated probe) at each CpG site [ 88 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%