“…Justice Marshall's concurring opinion raises the question of allowing prosecutors freedom to discriminate against blacks, so long as they held discrimination to an "acceptable level" (Batson v Kentucky 1986). Justice Marshall's concern is not without merit, it is only in a "particularly flagrant case where a defendant [will] be able to establish a prima facie case to require judicial inquiry into the prosecutor's motives" (Pizzi 1987). Each of the Justices that writes a concurring or dissenting opinion addresses the utilization of the Equal Protection Clause rather than the Sixth Amendment when deciding the Batson case; there was much to process in the means of future application and understanding of this monumental decision.…”
“…Justice Marshall's concurring opinion raises the question of allowing prosecutors freedom to discriminate against blacks, so long as they held discrimination to an "acceptable level" (Batson v Kentucky 1986). Justice Marshall's concern is not without merit, it is only in a "particularly flagrant case where a defendant [will] be able to establish a prima facie case to require judicial inquiry into the prosecutor's motives" (Pizzi 1987). Each of the Justices that writes a concurring or dissenting opinion addresses the utilization of the Equal Protection Clause rather than the Sixth Amendment when deciding the Batson case; there was much to process in the means of future application and understanding of this monumental decision.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.