1993
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-4683.1993.tb00123.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battered Women in Rural America

Abstract: Battered women in rural America are a neglected population. This article addresses the plight of these women and points to the unique sociological factors and religious beliefs that make them a difficult group to reach. Implications for counselor education programming are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if this is not entirely the case, scholars had emphasized the existence of good "ol" boy's networks in rural communities between patriarchical criminal justice officials and abusive local men making the reporting/prosecuting of intimate partner violence less likely (Websdale, 1998). Krishnan, Hilbert, and Pase (2001) and Lewis (2003) had also commented on the informal social norms in rural areas against speaking out publicly about abusive domestic relationships (see also Navin, Stockum, & Cambell-Ruggaard, 1993) and rural women's perceptions of the criminal justice system services for domestic abuse as less helpful when compared to urban women (Shannon et al, 2006). Additionally, telephone subscription rates had been reported as being very low in rural areas (Websdale, 1998), thus increasing the difficulty for victims for reporting intimate partner violence in a timely fashion (if at all).…”
Section: The Importance Of Rurality In Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if this is not entirely the case, scholars had emphasized the existence of good "ol" boy's networks in rural communities between patriarchical criminal justice officials and abusive local men making the reporting/prosecuting of intimate partner violence less likely (Websdale, 1998). Krishnan, Hilbert, and Pase (2001) and Lewis (2003) had also commented on the informal social norms in rural areas against speaking out publicly about abusive domestic relationships (see also Navin, Stockum, & Cambell-Ruggaard, 1993) and rural women's perceptions of the criminal justice system services for domestic abuse as less helpful when compared to urban women (Shannon et al, 2006). Additionally, telephone subscription rates had been reported as being very low in rural areas (Websdale, 1998), thus increasing the difficulty for victims for reporting intimate partner violence in a timely fashion (if at all).…”
Section: The Importance Of Rurality In Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in rural sections of Ohio and other states, there is widespread acceptance of woman abuse and community norms prohibiting victims from publicly talking about their experiences and from seeking social support (Krishnan, Hilbert, & Pase, 2001;Lewis, 2003;Navin, Stockum, & Campbell-Ruggaard, 1993). For example, one of our respondents said the following: Consider, too, the response that another respondent got from social service providers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…What is to be done about the plight of many rural women described by DeKeseredy and his colleagues, Gagn é (1992) , Websdale (1995aWebsdale ( , b, 1998 , and other researchers (for example, Navin et al , 1993 ;Krishnan et al , 2001 ;Logan et al , 2004Logan et al , , 2005? Here, we contend that some key principles of Second Generation Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) can be modifi ed to help reduce violence against women.…”
Section: Research and Theory On Rural Woman Abusementioning
confidence: 99%