1981
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(81)90021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayes procedures for detecting a shift in the probability of success in a series of Bernoulli trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown and Zacks (2006) investigated the detection of changes in a Poisson process. Zacks and Barzily (1981) extended the work of Shiryaev for the case of Bernoulli sequences. Optimal stopping rules based on Dynamic Programming procedures were discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown and Zacks (2006) investigated the detection of changes in a Poisson process. Zacks and Barzily (1981) extended the work of Shiryaev for the case of Bernoulli sequences. Optimal stopping rules based on Dynamic Programming procedures were discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We utilize the Dynamic Programming procedure developed by Zacks and Barzily (1981). We assume we must stop after observing n * observations if we have not stopped earlier.…”
Section: Optimal Stopping Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in parametric models these distributions may depend on unknown parameters, which have to be estimated from the data during the detection processes. Bayesian solutions to such cases have been developed by Zacks and Barzily (1981) using the backward induction principle of dynamic programming. They also considered the problem of detecting a change in the success probability in a sequence of binomial trials using a two-step look-ahead stopping rule.…”
Section: { /~11 -T-(1 -~)#1o : ]~1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMPIRICAL BAYES DETECTION 231 Clearly, if B = p-l(c_p) with c > p, then r* is the optimal rule for the variational problem. The stopping rule r* is equivalent to the one-step look-ahead stopping rule for the present problem; see, e.g., Zacks (1991) or Zacks and Barzily (1981). Optimality of myopic rules, such as r*, have been examined by Chow and Robbins (1961) and Abdel-Hameed (1977), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his discussion of Mei's paper, Zacks (2008, p. 413), also said that "cases of unknown prechange or postchange parameters should be dealt within a Bayesian framework" and refers to Zacks (1991, Sec. 5), Zacks and Barzily (1981), Kenett and Zacks (1994), and Brown and Zacks (2006) for related developments. He also pointed out that "important characteristics of the posterior processes, such as recursive determination of posterior probabilities, do not exist when the densities before and after the change are not completely known."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%