2019
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.20180317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian analysis of growth, stem straightness and branching quality in full-sib families of Eucalyptus globulus

Abstract: Eucalyptus globulus is one of the most commonly planted hardwood species for industrial use in various temperate regions around the world. The present study aimed to evaluate 62 full-sib families of E. globulus in one of the southernmost progeny trials of the species in the south of Chile. Estimates of genetic parameters for stem straightness, branching quality and growth traits were based on a Bayesian modelling approach using Gibbs sampling. A Bayes Factor (BF) analysis supported the hypothesis of significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction methods (genomic and pedigree-based) were also compared by the values of heritability and genetic gains. In the case of the pedigree-based method [80], the heritability (hfalse^a2) in a narrow sense was calculated as follows:hfalse^a2=σfalse^a2σfalse^a2+σfalse^ε2 where σfalse^a2 and σfalse^ε2 correspond to the additive genetic and residual variances, respectively. In the case of Bayesian genomic prediction models (SNP/haplotypes), genomic heritability (hfalse^g2), genomic variance (σfalse^g2) and the residual variance (σfalse^ε2) were estimated using the marginal posterior distributions of each estimated parameter [81,82,83].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction methods (genomic and pedigree-based) were also compared by the values of heritability and genetic gains. In the case of the pedigree-based method [80], the heritability (hfalse^a2) in a narrow sense was calculated as follows:hfalse^a2=σfalse^a2σfalse^a2+σfalse^ε2 where σfalse^a2 and σfalse^ε2 correspond to the additive genetic and residual variances, respectively. In the case of Bayesian genomic prediction models (SNP/haplotypes), genomic heritability (hfalse^g2), genomic variance (σfalse^g2) and the residual variance (σfalse^ε2) were estimated using the marginal posterior distributions of each estimated parameter [81,82,83].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ST was evaluated in the first 2/3 of the total height of the tree, considering an ordinal scale of seven levels, in which 0 represents trees with curvature in the first third of the total height of the tree, and 6 represents trees that could present a slight curvature in the upper third of the tree without loss of productivity (Ballesta et al, 2019). BQ was evaluated according to different criteria of quality (i.e., diameter, angle, and distribution of branches in the tree), considering an ordinal scale of six levels, in which 1 represents a tree with serious limitations and 6 represents a tree with all branching variables in good condition (Mora et al, 2019). Total tree height was measured using a Suunto R hypsometer, while DBH was measured with a diameter tape at 1.3 m above ground level.…”
Section: Eucalypt Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Adjusted-Entry Means of the general linear model (experimental design) were used as the adjusted phenotypes according to Contreras-Soto et al [26] and Arriagada et al [27]. Correlations between each pair of traits were calculated using a Bayesian bi-trait model [28][29][30]. The statistical analysis was performed using the R package MCMCglmm (version 3.6.1; https://www.r-project.org) [31].…”
Section: Snp-and Haplotype-based Gwasmentioning
confidence: 99%