Bayesian approach to SETI

Abstract

The search for technosignatures from hypothetical galactic civilizations is going through a new phase of intense activity. For the first time, a significant fraction of the vast search space is expected to be sampled in the foreseeable future, potentially bringing informative data about the abundance of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations, or the lack thereof. Starting from the current state of ignorance about the galactic population of non-natural electromagnetic signals, we formulate a Bayesian statistical model to infer the mean number of radio signals crossing Earth, assuming either non-detection or the detection of signals in future surveys of the Galaxy. Under fairly noninformative priors, we find that not detecting signals within about 1 kly from Earth, while suggesting the lack of galactic emitters or at best the scarcity thereof, is nonetheless still consistent with a probability exceeding 10 % that typically over ∼ 100 signals could be crossing Earth, with radiated power analogous to that of the Arecibo radar, but coming from farther in the Milky Way. The existence in the Galaxy of potentially detectable Arecibo-like emitters can be reasonably ruled out only if all-sky surveys detect no such signals up to a radius of about 40 kly, an endeavor requiring detector sensitivities thousands times higher than those of current telescopes. Conversely, finding even one Arecibo-like signal within ∼ 1000 light years, a possibility within reach of current detectors, implies almost certainly that typically more than ∼ 100 signals of comparable radiated power cross the Earth, yet to be discovered.

The Breakthrough Listen Search for Intelligent Life: Observations of 1327 Nearby Stars Over 1.10–3.45 GHz

“…Secondly, one could run Monte Carlo simulations in which transmitters are placed at different distances, and their signal properties are drawn from varied probability distributions, following a Bayesian approach (e.g. Grimaldi & Marcy 2018); this is an avenue for future investigation. Enriquez et.…”

Formalising the Pathways to Life Using Assembly Spaces

“…Technological processes are bootstrapped to biological ones, and hence, by extension, the production of technosignatures involves processes that necessarily have a biological origin. Examples of biosignatures and technosignatures include chemical products produced by the action of complex molecular systems such as networks of enzymes [ 20 ] and objects whose creation involved any biological organisms such as technological artefacts [ 21 ], complex chemicals made in the laboratory [ 22 ], and the complete works of Shakespeare. Finding the object in some abundance, or a single object with a large number of complex, but precisely repeating features, is required in order to distinguish single random occurrences from deliberately generated objects.…”

Darwin meets dr. Frankenstein: Using the Drake equation to calculate the probability of volcanic lightning's impact on chemical evolution

“…The choice of possible types of probability calculations depends on many factors, which become especially important when dealing with data-rich contexts, cosmological timescales, and sources of uncertainty that lead to significant discrepancies in results. On the other hand, Bayesian probability theory incorporates sources of uncertainty much better into its formulas and considers research information gaps and blind spots much more carefully (Scharf and Cronin, 2016;Grimaldi and Marcy, 2018). Insights from the philosophy and sociology of science come to the fore, especially in this kind of research framework and "almostmetaphysical" contexts.…”