Bayesian bias adjustments of the lung cancer SMR in a cohort of German carbon black production workers

Abstract

BackgroundA German cohort study on 1,528 carbon black production workers estimated an elevated lung cancer SMR ranging from 1.8-2.2 depending on the reference population. No positive trends with carbon black exposures were noted in the analyses. A nested case control study, however, identified smoking and previous exposures to known carcinogens, such as crystalline silica, received prior to work in the carbon black industry as important risk factors.We used a Bayesian procedure to adjust the SMR, based on a prior of seven independent parameter distributions describing smoking behaviour and crystalline silica dust exposure (as indicator of a group of correlated carcinogen exposures received previously) in the cohort and population as well as the strength of the relationship of these factors with lung cancer mortality. We implemented the approach by Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods (MCMC) programmed in R, a statistical computing system freely available on the internet, and we provide the program code.ResultsWhen putting a flat prior to the SMR a Markov chain of length 1,000,000 returned a median posterior SMR estimate (that is, the adjusted SMR) in the range between 1.32 (95% posterior interval: 0.7, 2.1) and 1.00 (0.2, 3.3) depending on the method of assessing previous exposures.ConclusionsBayesian bias adjustment is an excellent tool to effectively combine data about confounders from different sources. The usually calculated lung cancer SMR statistic in a cohort of carbon black workers overestimated effect and precision when compared with the Bayesian results. Quantitative bias adjustment should become a regular tool in occupational epidemiology to address narrative discussions of potential distortions.

Cross-Sectional Study on Nonmalignant Respiratory Morbidity due to Exposure to Synthetic Amorphous Silica

“…39,40 Probabilistic procedures are well developed and easily implemented in standard software packages that can evaluate such multiple exposure scenarios in terms of Monte Carlo multimodel analyses or Bayesian approaches. 24,41,42 Such extended analyses may not only affect the variance estimates of model coefficients but also the point estimates. The impact depends on the definition and weighting of the multiple exposure scenarios, which were considered here as of equal prior probability.…”

Exposure assessment for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide in German hard coal mining

“…Anchor values in 2007 were used as point estimates only and expert's assessments of historical developments of nitrogen oxide concentrations in diesel engine drivers and blasting crews were incorporated as if known for sure. A more realistic approach should consider quantitative estimates of the uncertainties involved by Monte Carlo simulation or Bayesian bias modeling (Steenland and Greenland 2004;Marsh et al 2007;Morfeld et al 2007) to evaluate the robustness of the Wndings.…”

Cross-Sectional Study on Respiratory Morbidity in Workers After Exposure to Synthetic Amorphous Silica at Five German Production Plants

“…The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) developed a taxonomy of terms and definitions for nanomaterials. [18][19][20] These methods are promising ways to address the challenges associated with conducting retrospective exposure assessments in the presence of sparse exposure data. Nanoscale is defined as a size range from approximately 1 to 100 nm.…”