2020
DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-3017-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian calibration of firn densification models

Abstract: Abstract. Firn densification modelling is key to understanding ice sheet mass balance, ice sheet surface elevation change, and the age difference between ice and the air in enclosed air bubbles. This has resulted in the development of many firn models, all relying to a certain degree on parameter calibration against observed data. We present a novel Bayesian calibration method for these parameters and apply it to three existing firn models. Using an extensive dataset of firn cores from Greenland and Antarctica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, changes in elevation of an ice sheet can be modeled using accumulation and temperature data or estimates as inputs to a firn compaction model (FCM). We use accumulation and temperature changes from RACMO2.3p2 outputs and the model developed by Stevens et al (2020) to account for firn compaction [54]. Referring to the implementation by Stevens et al…”
Section: From Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, changes in elevation of an ice sheet can be modeled using accumulation and temperature data or estimates as inputs to a firn compaction model (FCM). We use accumulation and temperature changes from RACMO2.3p2 outputs and the model developed by Stevens et al (2020) to account for firn compaction [54]. Referring to the implementation by Stevens et al…”
Section: From Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depth, which is referred to as critical depth, depends on the climate conditions including rate of accumulation and average temperature. Even though critical depth varies across the AIS, we use a contant firn column of depth 220 m inspired from Verjans et al ( 2020) [55]. The rate of densification depends on accumulation rate and temperature changes; consequently, it varies across the AIS, along with the climatic conditions.…”
Section: From Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as our primary analysis focuses on lake coverage, and comparison to RCM for possible correlations, we limit our consideration of these uncertainties to prior literature. We also modelled the evolution of north GVIIS's firn layer using the ArMAP parameterization in the Community Firn Model (CFM; Stevens et al, 2020;Verjans et al, 2020), to derive monthly estimates of ice lens depth, refreezing, runoff and firn air content (FAC) in the upper 10 m of the snowpack, with FAC representing the pore space available for meltwater storage. We use ArMAP due to its relevance to the study region, as it is a reparameterization of the firn densification model developed by Arthern et al (2010) which uses a Bayesian calibration framework on a dataset of firn cores from both Antarctica and Greenland, as detailed in Verjans et al, (2020).…”
Section: Climate and Firn Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also modelled the evolution of north GVIIS's firn layer using the ArMAP parameterization in the Community Firn Model (CFM; Stevens et al, 2020;Verjans et al, 2020), to derive monthly estimates of ice lens depth, refreezing, runoff and firn air content (FAC) in the upper 10 m of the snowpack, with FAC representing the pore space available for meltwater storage. We use ArMAP due to its relevance to the study region, as it is a reparameterization of the firn densification model developed by Arthern et al (2010) which uses a Bayesian calibration framework on a dataset of firn cores from both Antarctica and Greenland, as detailed in Verjans et al, (2020). The CFM was forced with daily data from MAR between 1979-2020, specifically surface temperature, surface melting and precipitation for all grid cells within our study area.…”
Section: Climate and Firn Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting firn profile is then compared to the measured profile. Unlike other recent studies (Lundin et al, 2017;Verjans et al, 2020) we use the objective measure of the root mean square deviation between measured and modelled density, which allows a simple and good comparability between the simulation result and the density measurement. To calculate the deviation, simulated density values are interpolated linearly to the measurement locations along the profile.…”
Section: Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%