2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian combination of sparse and non-sparse priors in image super resolution

Abstract: In this paper the application of image prior combinations to the Bayesian Super Resolution (SR) image registration and reconstruction problem is studied. Two sparse image priors, a Total Variation (TV) prior and a prior based on the 1 norm of horizontal and vertical first order differences (f.o.d.), are combined with a non-sparse Simultaneous Auto Regressive (SAR) prior. Since, for a given observation model, each prior produces a different posterior distribution of the underlying High Resolution (HR) image, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 shows a quantitative comparison in terms of PSNR, of the restorations of the images in Fig. 1 at different noise levels, obtained using the following methods: 1) bicubic interpolation (denoted by BBC), 2) the SR method in [8] (denoted by ZMT), which is based on backprojection with median filtering, 3) the robust SR method in [9] (denoted by RSR), which is based on bilateral TV priors, 4) the variational SR method using a TV prior in [10] (denoted by TV), 5) the variational SR method in [4] based in a combination of 1 and SAR priors (denoted by L1SAR), and our proposed algorithm 1 using the filter combinations 6) NF2, 7) NF3, 8) NF4 and 9) NF5. It can be observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 shows a quantitative comparison in terms of PSNR, of the restorations of the images in Fig. 1 at different noise levels, obtained using the following methods: 1) bicubic interpolation (denoted by BBC), 2) the SR method in [8] (denoted by ZMT), which is based on backprojection with median filtering, 3) the robust SR method in [9] (denoted by RSR), which is based on bilateral TV priors, 4) the variational SR method using a TV prior in [10] (denoted by TV), 5) the variational SR method in [4] based in a combination of 1 and SAR priors (denoted by L1SAR), and our proposed algorithm 1 using the filter combinations 6) NF2, 7) NF3, 8) NF4 and 9) NF5. It can be observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20), are not straightforward since B(s k ) is nonlinear with respect to s k . In [4] these estimations were performed by expanding B(s k ), using its first-order Taylor series, around the mean value < s k >=s k = (θ k ,h k ,v k ) T of the distribution q(s k ). We follow here the same approach, and refer to [4], where the detailed derivation and the resulting expressions for these estimated values may be found.…”
Section: Variational Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, following [9] the degradation process of a HR PET image x of N 1 ×N 2 is formulated as , 1,..., ,…”
Section: B Super Resolution Image Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step of our approach is to build a model to describe the relationship between the low-resolution image and the high-resolution image at the target date t 0 . We call it the observational model, which can be written in a matrix form as [48,49]:…”
Section: The Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%