2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.093021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian comparison ofU(1)lepton flavor models

Abstract: Whether the anarchical ansatz or more symmetric structures best describe the neutrino parameters is a long standing question that underwent a revival of interest after the discovery of a nonvanishing reactor angle and the indication of a non-maximal atmospheric angle. In this letter, a Bayesian statistical approach is adopted in order to analyse and compare the two hypotheses within the context of U (1) flavour models. We study the constraints on individual model parameters and perform model comparison: the re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as adopted in the context of the so-called Minimal Flavour Violation [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82], or more in general in flavour models [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98], a strategy to reestablish scale invariance consists in enlarging the spectrum by the addition of a scalar field, χ(x), that transforms under the scale symmetry: insertion of powers of this scalar field in the Lagrangian operators then allows to recover exactly scale invariance. Once it develops a VEV, fermion and scalar masses are correctly described and the scale symmetry is spontaneously broken with the arising of the corresponding GB, the dilaton.…”
Section: The Higgs-like Dilatonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as adopted in the context of the so-called Minimal Flavour Violation [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82], or more in general in flavour models [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98], a strategy to reestablish scale invariance consists in enlarging the spectrum by the addition of a scalar field, χ(x), that transforms under the scale symmetry: insertion of powers of this scalar field in the Lagrangian operators then allows to recover exactly scale invariance. Once it develops a VEV, fermion and scalar masses are correctly described and the scale symmetry is spontaneously broken with the arising of the corresponding GB, the dilaton.…”
Section: The Higgs-like Dilatonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that this number has no absolute meaning and could only be useful if compared with analogous numbers obtained by analyzing other models with a similar approach. A success rate of order 0.01 is a typical outcome in this kind of analysis for the most successful models [66,94,95].…”
Section: Jhep09(2014)095mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimation of the range of value it may acquire takes into consideration that ǫ should remain in the perturbative regime and that the value of v Φ is expected to be not so much smaller than Λ Φ (without a dynamical mechanism to explain it). In this letter, ǫ is taken in the interval [0.01, 0.3], consistently with previous studies on FN models [6,7]. The logarithm in eq.…”
Section: Jhep10(2017)168mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Once the scalar field φ, typically called flavon, develops a vacuum expectation value (VEV) the flavour symmetry is spontaneously broken and the Yukawa matrices can be written in terms of powers of φ /Λ F . Fermion mass hierarchies and mixing angles can then be explained by an appropriate choice of the FN charges [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The large number of free parameters, one for each entry of the Yukawa matrices, has the drawback of lowering the predictive power of the model: any value of fermion masses and mixings can indeed be reproduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%