2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian denoising in digital radiography: A comparison in the dental field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We typically choose a cost e = E {õ j }, {o j }; θ 0 , · · · , θ P−1 related to the quality of the processed images (for instance, [2] uses the average PSNR of {õ j }). Computing the derivatives of e with respect to the processing parameters may be difficult or even impossible in certain cases: for instance, when the parameters are discrete, as in the case of the patch size for NLM; or when the processing algorithm is iterative, as for TV denoising [6,16]; or when the cost function is not differentiable, as in the case of FSIM [17]. Therefore, we resort to a derivative-free optimization algorithm, the Nelder-Mead simplex method [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We typically choose a cost e = E {õ j }, {o j }; θ 0 , · · · , θ P−1 related to the quality of the processed images (for instance, [2] uses the average PSNR of {õ j }). Computing the derivatives of e with respect to the processing parameters may be difficult or even impossible in certain cases: for instance, when the parameters are discrete, as in the case of the patch size for NLM; or when the processing algorithm is iterative, as for TV denoising [6,16]; or when the cost function is not differentiable, as in the case of FSIM [17]. Therefore, we resort to a derivative-free optimization algorithm, the Nelder-Mead simplex method [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last application we consider is image deblurring through TV regularization. This problem is of particular importance in the medical and astronomical fields, where imaging apparatuses with a known point spread function measure single channel images with a very limited number of photons [6,16]. The problem can be stated as follow.…”
Section: Image Deblurringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a subjective visual assessment of the images was performed to appreciate the practical performance of the denoising methods from the clinicians' point of view. To our knowledge, very few studies 26,27 have investigated the denoising of dental radiographs, and in fact, the current study is the first to propose and evaluate the application of the BM3D and total variation methods for denoising dental micro-CT images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These categories are denoising, contrast enhancement, and sharpening algorithms. The denoising algorithms include a 2-D Butterworth low-pass filter (frequency domain) [9], Bayesian Least Squares -Gaussian Scaled Mixture (BLS-GSM) algorithm, and Total Variation (TV) filter [10]. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) [11,12] is an algorithm in literature meant for improving the contrast in dental radiographs.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, each value in the 2D vector corresponding to the difference, d is weighted by the corresponding value in the normalized gradient vector as, The operator, Γ in (9) indicates element-wise multiplication. The sharpened radiograph, (10) (11) In (10), α is an arbitrary parameter that determines the strength of sharpening. This parameter is called ad the scale.…”
Section: Gradient-adaptive Nonlinear Sharpening (Gns)mentioning
confidence: 99%