“…In short, we need to establish, develop, assess and refine… - effective and efficient ways of visualizing differences in quantities that allow us to make spatial and temporal comparisons [ 155 ]: 788 (see also [ 17 ], fig. 2 for a temporal view of a spatio-temporal dataset);
- methods for comparing quantities and ratios that vary by orders of magnitude [ 159 ]: 2380 (see also [ 82 ]) and that control for population size [ 155 ]: 788 ;
- effective ways of using layout and colour in combination in dense data graphics [ 139 ] (see also [ 17 ], fig. 4);
- visualization idioms to deal with large numbers of data items and new structures in data that are unexpected or important [ 160 ]: 705 , [ 150 ]: 687 ;
- consistent visual languages —something that is hard to achieve in a pandemic (in parallel)—that allow us to use colour, icons, other encodings and even interactions in ways that are common, predictable, consistent, effective and understood [ 153 ];
- narrative patterns for communicating in cases where subjects are sensitive or controversial [ 152 ], [ 153 ]: 706 ;
- approaches that minimize misinterpretation and account for it where it occurs [ 155 ]: 788 by addressing some of the open issues listed above, and through effective documentation, signposting, training, learning and co-design processes;
- effective ways of further embracing the emerging digital workspace for long-term immersive visualization support; and
- reliable and effective processes for conducting and supporting research through applied visualization that draw upon the themes identified through this engagement between epidemiological modellers and visualization researchers (§3e).
…”