2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.021109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of self-similarity exponent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A signal with scale-invariant correlations does not necessarily imply it possesses fractal patterns in other statistical properties such as multifractality and nonlinearity [15,43]. In addition, there are many other methods for the assessment of correlations that have comparable or even better performances than that of DFA [44]. Further studies using different analytical tools should be encouraged to confirm the observed influence of shift work on multiscale motor activity control.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signal with scale-invariant correlations does not necessarily imply it possesses fractal patterns in other statistical properties such as multifractality and nonlinearity [15,43]. In addition, there are many other methods for the assessment of correlations that have comparable or even better performances than that of DFA [44]. Further studies using different analytical tools should be encouraged to confirm the observed influence of shift work on multiscale motor activity control.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a sliding window in which we calculated the posterior distribution of the Hurst exponent. The width of the window was 150 data points and was chosen based on the validation test [29]. The corresponding time evolution of the posterior probability for the Hurst exponent of the X coordinate time series is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [28] for general background on mixed effects models and [29,30] for details on the Bayesian estimation of H from the observation of Y. As in this reference, for the analysis of the experimental Dictyostelium discoideum cell track data, we took a scaling invariant Jeffreys-like prior for λ [31] with density π (λ) ∼ λ −1 , a flat, (or diffuse) prior for β with density π (β) 1, as well as a flat prior for H with density π (H ) = χ [0,1] [32].…”
Section: B Fractional Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them we mention range scale estimators [10], maximum likelihood [17], KarhunenLoeve expansion [18], p-variation [19], periodograms [20,21], weigthed functional [22], and linear Bayesian models [23].…”
Section: ] B Denotes Expectation Values Taken Over the Values Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%