2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian forecasting using stochastic search variable selection in a VAR subject to breaks

Abstract: This paper builds a model which has two extensions over a standard VAR. The …rst of these is stochastic search variable selection, which is an automatic model selection device which allows for coe¢ -cients in a possibly over-parameterized VAR to be set to zero. The second allows for an unknown number of structual breaks in the VAR parameters. We investigate the in-sample and forecasting performance of our model in an application involving a commonly-used US macroeconomic data set. We …nd that, in-sample, these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used such algorithms in previous work (e.g. Korobilis, 2012 or Jochmann, Koop andStrachan, 2010), but they require the use of MCMC methods and, thus, are computationally daunting with large TVP-VARs. always forecasts better than the former for h = 1.…”
Section: Forecast Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used such algorithms in previous work (e.g. Korobilis, 2012 or Jochmann, Koop andStrachan, 2010), but they require the use of MCMC methods and, thus, are computationally daunting with large TVP-VARs. always forecasts better than the former for h = 1.…”
Section: Forecast Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchical prior for η takes the same mixture forms of Normal as discussed above for α. For further details, interested readers are referred to George et al (2008) and Jochmann et al (2010).…”
Section: Stochastic Search Variable Selection (Ssvs) Prior For Both Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the trivariate VAR(4) used in Jochmann, Koop and Strachan (2009) has 36 VAR coefficients and SSVS picks out only 10 of these as having important explanatory power. In such a situation, the number of hypothesis tests required in a sequential testing procedure could lead the researcher to serious worries about pre-test problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%