2015
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian inference on the sphere beyond statistical isotropy

Abstract: Abstract. We present a general method for Bayesian inference of the underlying covariance structure of random fields on a sphere. We employ the Bipolar Spherical Harmonic (BipoSH) representation of general covariance structure on the sphere. We illustrate the efficacy of the method as a principled approach to assess violation of statistical isotropy (SI) in the sky maps of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) fluctuations. SI violation in observed CMB maps arise due to known physical effects such as Doppler boost… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hope that the approach developed here provides a conceptually straightforward way to understand the search for anisotropy in the GW background and aids in the development of observational/analysis strategies for the PTA search for gravitational waves. It will be interesting in future work to compare the results here to those obtained from detailed simulations of the PTA analysis pipeline, as well as with those inferred from a fully Bayesian approach (see similar applications for the cosmic microwave background [38,39], for example). It will also be interesing to extend the analysis here to seek anisotropies in the polarization of the GW background, as parametrized, for example, by GW Stokes parameters [40], or anisotropies in the frequency dependence of the GW background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope that the approach developed here provides a conceptually straightforward way to understand the search for anisotropy in the GW background and aids in the development of observational/analysis strategies for the PTA search for gravitational waves. It will be interesting in future work to compare the results here to those obtained from detailed simulations of the PTA analysis pipeline, as well as with those inferred from a fully Bayesian approach (see similar applications for the cosmic microwave background [38,39], for example). It will also be interesing to extend the analysis here to seek anisotropies in the polarization of the GW background, as parametrized, for example, by GW Stokes parameters [40], or anisotropies in the frequency dependence of the GW background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) technique [1,[11][12][13] is based on Classical Hamiltonian Mechanics and if a group of particles is placed in the region will faithfully map the potential distribution given that all of them start from random velocity following normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance. The HMC method can sample the distribution more effectively even in very high dimensional space in comparison to the conventional MCMC methods.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choice of m a lm and m A LM ll decides the stability of the integration process. The error propagation equation demands that for integratingȧ lm , hM −1 lml m (S −1 lml m + N −1 l ) < 2.3, where h is the step size in the integration process and M lml m is the mass matrix for a lm [1,15] . As we define an individual mass to each of a lm , the mass matrix, M lml m is diagonal.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…126,127 However, modeling these super-Chandrasekhar explosions requires taking into account not only the effects of the magnetic pressure, but also dealing with general-relativistic corrections. A full treatment of these issues has only recently been done, 128,129 and although this research line is promising more theoretical calculations are needed to confirm the results obtained so far. Finally, we mention that another possibility has arised recently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%