2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Model Updating and Its Limitations for Detecting Local Damage of an Existing Truss Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pedroza Torres et al proposed a hybrid methodology method based on the results of a comparative study between self‐organizing maps and Bayesian networks in order to reduce computational cost and improve performance in fault condition detection of structures; the proposed method can detect damage efficiently based on numerical results of a truss. Mustafa and Matsumoto presented a Bayesian model‐updating method for detecting local damage by introducing a new objective function and a realistic parameterization of the mass and stiffness matrices; the FE model of a real steel truss bridge can be updated effectively using four identified stiffness parameters from the measured vibration data; numerical and experimental results of a real truss bridge show that the method could only detect local damage when the global modal parameters changed significantly.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Truss Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedroza Torres et al proposed a hybrid methodology method based on the results of a comparative study between self‐organizing maps and Bayesian networks in order to reduce computational cost and improve performance in fault condition detection of structures; the proposed method can detect damage efficiently based on numerical results of a truss. Mustafa and Matsumoto presented a Bayesian model‐updating method for detecting local damage by introducing a new objective function and a realistic parameterization of the mass and stiffness matrices; the FE model of a real steel truss bridge can be updated effectively using four identified stiffness parameters from the measured vibration data; numerical and experimental results of a real truss bridge show that the method could only detect local damage when the global modal parameters changed significantly.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Truss Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) is study uses some optimization algorithms to improve the performance of the ANN model, and the accuracy, rationality, and speed are better than the traditional back-propagation neural network [40]. (3) is study shows that an estimation of the damage states of many bridges in a few minutes can be achieved, while previous studies usually evaluate the performance of one bridge [21,22] or some components [19]. (4) is method can be used under both preearthquake and postearthquake conditions.…”
Section: Main Contributions and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methodologies have been proposed to assess the fragility [18] or the damage of a bridge. Some of the previous studies have evaluated individual bridges in detail by using different methods, such as multipoint acceleration measurement and ANNs [19], assessing the relative risks of the failure modes of a bridge and the limitations of risk priority numbers (RPNs) associated with individual failure modes [20], as well as the Bayesian method [21]. Some studies present the assessment methods of bridge components [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1618 In addition, Bayesian approaches have been used to assess the health state of bridges. 1921 However, these approaches mainly focus on updating the estimation of the bridge materials property (e.g. the values of the bridge stiffness) and behaviour (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%