2019
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian modeling of flood control networks for failure cascade characterization and vulnerability assessment

Abstract: This paper presents a Bayesian network model to assess the vulnerability of the flood control infrastructure and to simulate failure cascade based on the topological structure of flood control networks along with hydrological information gathered from sensors. Two measures are proposed to characterize the flood control network vulnerability and failure cascade: (a) node failure probability (NFP), which determines the failure likelihood of each network component under each scenario of rainfall event, and (b) fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current flooding warning systems such as Harris County Flood Warning System (HCFWS, 2019) provide monitoring (based on flood stream gauges). Additionally, there are methods such as Bayesian network model that enable vulnerability assessment in urban areas (Dong, Yu, Farahmand, & Mostafavi, 2019). However, these systems and models provide limited predictive flood warning capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current flooding warning systems such as Harris County Flood Warning System (HCFWS, 2019) provide monitoring (based on flood stream gauges). Additionally, there are methods such as Bayesian network model that enable vulnerability assessment in urban areas (Dong, Yu, Farahmand, & Mostafavi, 2019). However, these systems and models provide limited predictive flood warning capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to use H&H for predictive flood warning and situation awareness as a flooding event unfolds is rather limited. Because it is critical to acquire the flood information in a predictive fashion for emergency response operations, an accurate network failure (i.e., overflow) prediction model is needed to capture the spatial and temporal failure cascading process to better protect citizens and infrastructures from the flooding (Dong, Yu et al., 2019). Various methods have been proposed to support real‐time flood forecast, including the U.S. National Weather service ensemble forecasting (Koren et al., 1999), fuzzy reasoning method (Liong, Lim, Kojiri, & Hori, 2000), the river flow forecast system (Moore, Jones, Bird, & Cottingham, 1990), neural networks (Thirumalaiah & Deo, 1998; Besaw, Rizzo, Bierman, & Hackett, 2010), transfer function methods (Young, 2002), functional networks (Bruen & Yang, 2005), and generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) (Romanowicz & Beven, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced deep learning methods can also be explored. For example, Bayesian networks can be used for evaluating the estimation uncertainty (Dong, Yu, Farahmand, & Mostafavi, 2020; Wang, Liu, & Ni, 2018). In addition, the dynamic interactions among the buildings and sites are not considered in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a series of models including the capacity-load model [17][18][19], binary influence model [20,21], sandpile model [22], ORNL-PSerc-Alaska (OPA) [23], CASCADE model [24], and coupled map lattice model [25], has been proposed to describe the cascading failure phenomenon of the URTN. The current research mainly focuses on the capacity-load model, which assumes that the capacity is proportional to the initial load and is mainly applied to simulate the cascading failure of the network [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%