2013
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.823866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Modeling of Temporal Dependence in Large Sparse Contingency Tables

Abstract: In many applications, it is of interest to study trends over time in relationships among categorical variables, such as age group, ethnicity, religious affiliation, political party and preference for particular policies. At each time point, a sample of individuals provide responses to a set of questions, with different individuals sampled at each time. In such settings, there tends to be abundant missing data and the variables being measured may change over time. At each time point, one obtains a large sparse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This factorization induces a provably flexible statistical model, which incorporates dimensionality reduction, and borrows information between the cell probabilities in sparse tables to provide efficient inference on the entire joint probability mass function. Notable recent generalizations of the model proposed by Dunson and Xing (2009) incorporate additional sparsity , dynamic patterns (Kunihama and Dunson, 2013), classification of univariate outcomes (Yang and Dunson, 2016), data imputation (Fosdick et al, 2016;Murray and Reiter, 2016), and inference in case-control studies with several categorical predictors . Refer to Johndrow et al (2017) for a theoretical justification, and connections with log-linear models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This factorization induces a provably flexible statistical model, which incorporates dimensionality reduction, and borrows information between the cell probabilities in sparse tables to provide efficient inference on the entire joint probability mass function. Notable recent generalizations of the model proposed by Dunson and Xing (2009) incorporate additional sparsity , dynamic patterns (Kunihama and Dunson, 2013), classification of univariate outcomes (Yang and Dunson, 2016), data imputation (Fosdick et al, 2016;Murray and Reiter, 2016), and inference in case-control studies with several categorical predictors . Refer to Johndrow et al (2017) for a theoretical justification, and connections with log-linear models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially log‐linear models can be used, but unless the vast majority of the interactions are discarded a priori, one obtains an unmanageably enormous number of terms to estimate, store, and process. These bottlenecks are freed by the use of Bayesian low rank tensor factorizations, which have had promising performance in practice ((Dunson and Xing, ); (Bhattacharya and Dunson, ); (Kunihama and Dunson, ); (Zhou et al, )). Johndrow, Bhattacharya, and Dunson (2014) recently showed that a large subclass of sparse log‐linear models have low rank tensor factorizations, providing support for the use of tensor factorizations as a computationally convenient alternative.…”
Section: Conditional Sparse Parallel Factor Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequentially observed count tensors present unique statistical challenges because they tend to be bursty [12], high-dimensional, and sparse [13,14]. There are few models that are tailored to the challenging properties of both time series and count tensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%