2017
DOI: 10.1002/pst.1819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian nonparametric statistics: A new toolkit for discovery in cancer research

Abstract: Many commonly used statistical methods for data analysis or clinical trial design rely on incorrect assumptions, or assume an over-simplified framework that ignores important information. Such statistical practices may lead to incorrect conclusions about treatment effects, or clinical trial designs that are impractical or that do not accurately reflect the investigator’s goals. Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) models and methods are a very flexible new class of statistical tools that can overcome such limitations.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if goodness-of-fit analyses show that the proportional hazards assumption is not valid for a survival-time dataset, then the Cox model should not be used [ 63 ]. Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) regression models for P(Y | X, Z) are a family of robust models that can accurately approximate any distribution, due to the property of “full support” [ 55 , 64 , 65 ]. Moreover, BNP regression models can be used to correct for bias.…”
Section: Causal Modeling Of Treatment Effect Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, if goodness-of-fit analyses show that the proportional hazards assumption is not valid for a survival-time dataset, then the Cox model should not be used [ 63 ]. Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) regression models for P(Y | X, Z) are a family of robust models that can accurately approximate any distribution, due to the property of “full support” [ 55 , 64 , 65 ]. Moreover, BNP regression models can be used to correct for bias.…”
Section: Causal Modeling Of Treatment Effect Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTEs may take much more complex forms than the treatment–covariate interactions in the LIN given above. In such a case, more flexible statistical methods such as a regression tree [ 77 , 78 ], neural net [ 79 ], or BNP regression model [ 64 ] may be applied to capture complicated patterns, such as high-order interactions among X and elements of a vector (Z, B) of variables that includes both patient prognostic covariates Z and a biomarker B. These models lack a uniform component that can be called LIN.…”
Section: Causal Modeling Of Treatment Effect Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BNP models have been applied to a broad range of statistical problems, including density estimation, regression, clustering and survival analysis. See, for example, Müller et al (2015) for general applications, Mitra and Müller (2015) for applications in biostatistics, or Müller and Mitra (2013); Thall et al (2017) for overviews and illustrations. Given a Bayesian model f ( y | τ , x , θ ) and utility function U ( y , x ), we use posterior predictive utility distributions as a basis for deciding between treatments for a new patient with prognostic variables x .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of clusters is then inferred while fitting the mixture model using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling [26]. This approach has not been widely used in clinical cancer research because these algorithms are still computationally expensive, but recent advances in Bayesian variational inference have made this approach scalable for precision oncology applications [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%