2021
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.3023450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Optimization With Improved Scalability and Derivative Information for Efficient Design of Nanophotonic Structures

Abstract: We propose the combination of forward shape derivatives and the use of an iterative inversion scheme for Bayesian optimization to find optimal designs of nanophotonic devices. This approach widens the range of applicability of Bayesian optmization to situations where a larger number of iterations is required and where derivative information is available. This was previously impractical because the computational efforts required to identify the next evaluation point in the parameter space became much larger tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , l N are chosen to maximize the likelihood of the observations [33,34]. Afterwards, only µ 0 , σ 0 are optimized and the length scales l 1 , .…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. , l N are chosen to maximize the likelihood of the observations [33,34]. Afterwards, only µ 0 , σ 0 are optimized and the length scales l 1 , .…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, one can compute its Cholesky decomposition K = L K L T K into a lower and upper triangular matrix in O(M 3 ) steps for M ≤ M hyper . For constant length scales (i.e., M > M hyper ) an update of the decomposition only requires O(M 2 ) steps [34]. Afterwards, one solves…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a way, meso scale design can be seen as a compromise that permits flexible variation of the properties of the material, whilst being very resource effective. In this approach, such ML techniques as Bayesian optimization or genetic algorithms can be used as efficient tools for exploring the structure-property space and for solving the inverse problem [65][66][67]. A particular problem that can be solved in this way is the determination of the limit values of material Figure 6.…”
Section: Architectured Lattice Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each iteration, the surrogate is used to identify new trial model parameters that maximize for example the expected improvement or the probability of improvement. The approach offers a large degree of flexibility such that many extensions of BO have been proposed to cope, e.g., with a large number of model parameters, 8,9 a large number of observations, 10 or noisy model outputs. 11 Typically, BO methods are used to optimize scalar functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%