2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.122002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian parameter estimation in the second LISA Pathfinder mock data challenge

Abstract: A main scientific output of the LISA Pathfinder mission is to provide a noise model that can be extended to the future gravitational wave observatory, LISA. The success of the mission depends thus upon a deep understanding of the instrument, especially the ability to correctly determine the parameters of the underlying noise model. In this work we estimate the parameters of a simplified model of the LISA Technology Package (LTP) instrument. We describe the LTP by means of a closed-loop model that is used to ge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref [5,6] a frequentist approach to the problem was developed using both linear and non-linear parameter estimation techniques respectively. In Ref [7] a Bayesian framework was developed for the second LISA Pathfinder mock data challenge, based on a classic Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) scheme for parameter estimation [8,9]. From the point of view of the present paper, the method presented in Ref [7] is comparable with the algorithm working with the direct physical parameters and proposing the MCMC jumps from a multivariate Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref [5,6] a frequentist approach to the problem was developed using both linear and non-linear parameter estimation techniques respectively. In Ref [7] a Bayesian framework was developed for the second LISA Pathfinder mock data challenge, based on a classic Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) scheme for parameter estimation [8,9]. From the point of view of the present paper, the method presented in Ref [7] is comparable with the algorithm working with the direct physical parameters and proposing the MCMC jumps from a multivariate Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Bayesian analysis has become a very useful tool in the field of space based gravitational waves [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and has also been applied to LISA Pathfinder data analysis [7]. One of the advantages of Bayesian analysis is that it provides a direct method of calculating the marginalised posterior density function (PDF) for each of the parameters via Bayes' theorem where p(λ|s) is the posterior density function (PDF) for the solution λ given the data s(t), π(λ) denotes the prior probability of the parameters and p(s|λ) is the likelihood, which we will define below.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis and Markov Chain Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The B and C j coefficients, on the other hand, were estimated using a global parameter estimation method, which included all the available measurements for all the channels at the same time. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method [18][19][20] was used as the parameter estimation technique. MCMC methods are advantageous over other techniques as they are straightforward to implement and allow the estimation for the mean value of the parameters and their posterior distribution.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, dedicated experiments are going to be performed in order to estimate the unknown parameters of the system. And for that purpose, a number of parameter estimation methods and models of the LTP have been implemented [4][5][6]. The main question that arises is about the suitability of the different models implemented or, in simpler terms, which model can describe better the observations of the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%