2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-007-9046-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Procedures for Identifying Aberrant Response-Time Patterns in Adaptive Testing

Abstract: adaptive testing, Bayesian predictive checks, cheating, collateral information, hierarchical modeling, response times,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
178
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
178
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Residual analysis and checks on aberrant response patterns have been proposed, and extensive literature reviews have been done by Sijtsma (1995, 2001) and Karabatsos (2003). A check for RT patterns has been discussed by van der Linden and van Krimpen-Stoop (2003) and van der Linden and Guo (2008), who have mainly been interested in detecting cheating behavior. Their method is based on evaluating the posterior probability that an observed RT is lower or higher than the posterior predicted RT under the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Residual analysis and checks on aberrant response patterns have been proposed, and extensive literature reviews have been done by Sijtsma (1995, 2001) and Karabatsos (2003). A check for RT patterns has been discussed by van der Linden and van Krimpen-Stoop (2003) and van der Linden and Guo (2008), who have mainly been interested in detecting cheating behavior. Their method is based on evaluating the posterior probability that an observed RT is lower or higher than the posterior predicted RT under the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Linden and Guo (2008) introduce two types of aberrant response behavior: (a) attempts at memorization, which might reveal themselves by random RTs; and (b) item preknowledge, which might result in an unusual combination of a correct response and RTs. RT patterns are considered to be suspicious when an answer is correct and the RT is relatively small while the probability of success on the item is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the fit of the model to the RT data we used Bayesian residual analysis (Klein Entink et al, 2009;van der Linden & Guo, 2008). The left-tail posterior predictive probability for each observed log-RT (i.e., the probability of observing a value smaller than the observed ln T pi ) was approximated by …”
Section: Analysis Of the Dutch Language Test Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual analysis and person-fit statistics have been proposed to examine aberrant response patterns, or more specially, item preknowledge (e.g., Drasgow, Levine, & Williams, 1985;Karabatsos, 2003;McLeod & Lewis, 1999;McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003;Meijer & Sijtsma, 2001;Segall, 2002;Shu, Henson, & Luecht, 2013). Residual analysis of both response and timing data has also been considered for the same purpose (e.g., van der Linden & Guo, 2008). More recently, there has been research concerning test collusion, or large-scale sharing of test materials or answers to one or more subsets of items prior to the examination (Belov, 2013(Belov, , 2014Wollack & Maynes, 2016;Zhang, Searcy, & Horn, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%