2007
DOI: 10.1198/016214506000000780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Extreme Precipitation Return Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
451
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 466 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
451
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the empirical quantiles at the stations used here confirmed this behavior. For precipitation, the form of the tail appears to vary with duration (Buishand 1991;Pearson and Henderson 1998), geographical location (Revfeim 1982;Buishand and Demaré 1990;Pearson and Henderson 1998;Friederichs 2010;Toreti et al 2010;Maraun et al 2011), and altitude (Pearson and Henderson 1998;Cooley et al 2007;Gardes and Girard 2010). For daily precipitation, the shape parameter appears to be mostly light or heavy-tailed.…”
Section: Imt Selection and Gpd Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the empirical quantiles at the stations used here confirmed this behavior. For precipitation, the form of the tail appears to vary with duration (Buishand 1991;Pearson and Henderson 1998), geographical location (Revfeim 1982;Buishand and Demaré 1990;Pearson and Henderson 1998;Friederichs 2010;Toreti et al 2010;Maraun et al 2011), and altitude (Pearson and Henderson 1998;Cooley et al 2007;Gardes and Girard 2010). For daily precipitation, the shape parameter appears to be mostly light or heavy-tailed.…”
Section: Imt Selection and Gpd Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closely related approach, typically used in Bayesian modeling using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, is to represent variation in extremal parameters through spatial Gaussian processes. For example, Cooley et al (2007) fit rainfall exceedances using a GPD model (Eq. (3)) in which log σ follows such a process, but the shape parameter has two values, and many similar models have appeared in the literature (Coles and Casson 1998;Casson and Coles 1999;Gelfand 2009, 2010).…”
Section: Basic Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chavez-Demoulin et al (2011) point out that inclusion of covariates in the usual parameterization of the GPD model leads to a lack of invariance to the choice of threshold that can be resolved using the GEV parameterization. One major difference between models such as that of Cooley et al (2007) and those proposed below is that the former fit univariate extremal distributions to data at particular spatial locations, but treat the margins as independent, conditional on the covariates, so risk estimates for spatial quantities may be poor, though those at individual locations can be expected to improve because of borrowing of strength across the spatial domain. By contrast, the models described here aim to capture joint spatial properties of extremes in addition to their marginal variation.…”
Section: Basic Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooley et al (2007) ran simulations to show that using thresholds in the middle of the discretization interval provides numerically stable estimations, which is the approach we took here. Another possibility would be to artificially add noise to the observations to break the ties that cause the numerical difficulties (see Einmahl & Magnus 2008).…”
Section: Point Process Model Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%