2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian uncertainty modeling for programming by demonstration

Abstract: Abstract-Programming by Demonstration allows to transfer skills from human demonstrators to robotic systems by observation and reproduction. One aspect that is often overlooked is that humans show different trajectories over multiple demonstrations for the same task. Observed movements may be more precise in some phases and more diverse in others. It is wellknown that the variability of the execution carries important information about the task. Therefore, we propose a Bayesian approach to model uncertainties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work in [36] proposes a feedback linearizing control law, which adapts online the weights of a neural network model. It shows boundedness of the adaptation law and the resulting controller but cannot quantify the ultimate bound because neural networks -in comparison to GPs -do not inherently provide a measure for the fidelity of the model [37]. This becomes important, if the controller is applied in safety critical domains, where the tracking error must be quantified to avoid failure or damage to the system.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [36] proposes a feedback linearizing control law, which adapts online the weights of a neural network model. It shows boundedness of the adaptation law and the resulting controller but cannot quantify the ultimate bound because neural networks -in comparison to GPs -do not inherently provide a measure for the fidelity of the model [37]. This becomes important, if the controller is applied in safety critical domains, where the tracking error must be quantified to avoid failure or damage to the system.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they do not encode input-dependent covariance. Works such as [10], [17], which propose formulations for regressing both uncertainty and correlation, may provide the possibility to simultaneously consider both aspects into our approach, which can potentially allow us to study the complementarity of the two Fig. 7: Stiffness and damping gains along x 2 , estimated for three points at increasing distances from the training data.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this notion and its implications in practical scenarios have been debated to some extent as different state-of-the-art probabilistic techniques provide complementary notions of variance. In [10], Umlauft et al discuss the differences between variance being interpreted as uncertainty and variability. The topic is also covered in [11], where the different notions are exploited in scenarios that require the combination of different controllers, and in [12], in the context of robot dynamics with multiple additive noise sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by benefiting from the KMP predictions, it unifies the best Types of prediction Variability Uncertainty Correlations GMM/GMR [3] -GPR [8] --HGP [15], [16] -MDN [17] -Our approach of the two approaches. Umlauft et al [18] propose a related formulation where, using Wishart processes, they build full covariance matrices with uncertainty. However their solution requires a very high number of parameters, whose estimation relies heavily on optimization, and their control gains are set heuristically.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%