2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-020-0151-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BCC-ESM1 Model Datasets for the CMIP6 Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP)

Abstract: BCC-ESM1 is the first version of the Beijing Climate Center’s Earth System Model, and is participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP) is the only CMIP6-endorsed MIP in which BCC-ESM1 is involved. All AerChemMIP experiments in priority 1 and seven experiments in priorities 2 and 3 have been conducted. The DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and CMIP historical simulations have also been run… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many also have interactive tropospheric chemistry and aerosol schemes. Six such ESMs are employed in this study: BCC-ESM1 (Wu et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021), EC-Earth-AerChem (van Noije et al, 2021), GFDL-ESM4 (Dunne et al, 2020), MPI-ESM-1-2-HAM (Neubauer et al, 2019), NorESM2-LM (Seland et al, 2020, and UKESM1-0-LL (Sellar et al, 2019). The surface air temperature simulated in corresponding models with lower-complexity is also examined: BCC-CSM2-MR (Wu et al, 2019b), EC-Earth3 (Döscher et al, 2021), and MPI-ESM1-2-LR (Mauritsen et al, 2019) with prescribed tropospheric chemistry and aerosol; GFDL-CM4 (Held et al, 2019), NorCPM1 (Bethke et al, 2019), and HadGEM3-GC31-LL (Williams et al, 2017) with a prescribed tropospheric chemistry and interactive aerosol scheme.…”
Section: Cmip6 Esmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many also have interactive tropospheric chemistry and aerosol schemes. Six such ESMs are employed in this study: BCC-ESM1 (Wu et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021), EC-Earth-AerChem (van Noije et al, 2021), GFDL-ESM4 (Dunne et al, 2020), MPI-ESM-1-2-HAM (Neubauer et al, 2019), NorESM2-LM (Seland et al, 2020, and UKESM1-0-LL (Sellar et al, 2019). The surface air temperature simulated in corresponding models with lower-complexity is also examined: BCC-CSM2-MR (Wu et al, 2019b), EC-Earth3 (Döscher et al, 2021), and MPI-ESM1-2-LR (Mauritsen et al, 2019) with prescribed tropospheric chemistry and aerosol; GFDL-CM4 (Held et al, 2019), NorCPM1 (Bethke et al, 2019), and HadGEM3-GC31-LL (Williams et al, 2017) with a prescribed tropospheric chemistry and interactive aerosol scheme.…”
Section: Cmip6 Esmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ucsd.edu/RG_Climatology.html which were complemented using YoMaHa data accessible at http://apdrc.soest. hawaii.edu/projects/yomaha/, GLORYS data from https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/, MOM6-JRA data available at https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/mom-ocean-model/, MOM6-MERRA2 output by Harrison (2022) is archived with an associated https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6342240, and the 32 CMIP6 models' data can be found at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6 (Bader et al, 2019a(Bader et al, , 2019bBentsen et al, 2019;Boucher et al, 2018;Cao & Wang, 2019;Danabasoglu, 2019aDanabasoglu, , 2019bDix et al, 2019;(EC-Earth), 2019Guo et al, 2018;Hajima et al, 2019;Huang, 2019;Jungclaus et al, 2019;Lee & Liang, 2020;Li, 2019;Lovato & Peano, 2020;Lovato et al, 2021;(NASA/GISS), 2018Park & Shin, 2019;Ridley et al, 2019;Seferian, 2018;Seland et al, 2019;Stouffer, 2019;Swart et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2019;Tatebe & Watanabe, 2018;Voldoire, 2018;Wu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018;Ziehn et al, 2019). The hydrographic data collected during the expedition of the German Research Vessel Maria S. Merian (MSM60) at 34.5°S can be accessed at https://doi.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate an initial value for a critical FSM filling parameter (“runoff depth,” a vertical depth quantity with which the DEM is lightly filled), (Barnes et al, 2021) we compared Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) (Zhang et al, 2019) Precipitation (P)–Evapotranspiration (ET) data (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/projections-cmip6?tab=form) with Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) Water Survey of Canada (WSC) observations of river discharge for 1690 active gauging stations throughout Canada. Due to the Canadian Shield's crystalline bedrock substrate and abundant permafrost, we assume negligible subsurface infiltration and storage.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%