2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00092279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beads, social change and interaction between India and South-east Asia

Abstract: The author shows how technical studies of beads made of agate and carnelian are informative indicators of social conditions and contacts between regions. The beads in question throw new light on the relations between India and South-east Asia in the first millennium BC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the Iron Age, it is well known that agate, carnelian and glass beads indicate some sort of contact with distant Indian sources and ideas (Glover 1998;Higham 1989Higham , 2002Bellina 2003;Theunissen 2003). These artefacts are regular finds across northeast Thailand.…”
Section: Regional Trade and Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Iron Age, it is well known that agate, carnelian and glass beads indicate some sort of contact with distant Indian sources and ideas (Glover 1998;Higham 1989Higham , 2002Bellina 2003;Theunissen 2003). These artefacts are regular finds across northeast Thailand.…”
Section: Regional Trade and Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vu 1991;Glover 1996;Ha V.T. 1998;Bellina 2003;Yamagata 2006;Hung et al 2007;Lam 2008;Hung and Bellwood 2010), are the hundreds of burial sites containing thousands of inhumations within large jars excavated across central and Southern Vietnam (see Figure 18.1). In addition to the burials, these sites have also produced a wide variety of other material culture that includes objects related to daily life and ritual, including bronze and iron implements, pottery and ornaments of various types, either placed within the jars (with the body) or buried adjacent to them.…”
Section: Sa Huynh Jar-burial Sites and Ornamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this perspective, the strong impact of Indian religious practices among coastal groups in early history and their role in royal courts of rising Southeast Asian powers can be recognized from archaeological data. New research on technology, glass and stone beads making in particular, also led to common agreement that cultural exchanges were not one way, and did not simply imply Indianization or Sinicization, but reflect Southeast Asianization and localization (Bellina 2003;Hirano 2008;Bellina and Glover 2004: 68). Ban Don Ta Phet, Phu Khao Thong and Khao Sam Kaeo in Thailand, Sa Huynh sites in central and several Iron Age sites in the coast of southern Vietnam are among the most important sites for understanding the nature and the role of maritime networks in Southeast Asian state formation processes (Glover, Bellina 2011;Lam 2011;Bui et.…”
Section: Hindu Belief Practices Among the Populacementioning
confidence: 99%