2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2021.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam optics in nuclear microprobe: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the lateral resolving power of Rutherford backscattering spectrometry is improved by focusing the primary ion beam. However, the key issues with focusing the beam to below the sub-micrometre regime are the reduced ion beam current and the concomitant impractical analysis time, and the highly localised fluence causing detrimental beam damage 11 , 21 , 22 . Here we instead probe a large ensemble of nanostructures simultaneously, thereby drastically enhancing the sensitivity and avoiding the beam damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the lateral resolving power of Rutherford backscattering spectrometry is improved by focusing the primary ion beam. However, the key issues with focusing the beam to below the sub-micrometre regime are the reduced ion beam current and the concomitant impractical analysis time, and the highly localised fluence causing detrimental beam damage 11 , 21 , 22 . Here we instead probe a large ensemble of nanostructures simultaneously, thereby drastically enhancing the sensitivity and avoiding the beam damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%